IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL: NEW DELHI

SINGLE PRINCIPAL BENCH

ITEM No. 103

IN THE MATTER OF:

KSS Petron Private Limited …. Petitioner

Vs.

Bhubaneshwar Expressways Pvt Ltd …. Respondent

AND

New Cont. P-46/2025

In

TA (IBC) - 37(PB)/2025

IN THE MATTER OF:

Sayam Shares & Securities (P) Ltd …. Applicant

Vs.

Mr. Vineet Chaudhary & Ors. …. Respondent

Order under Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016 & Section 425 of Companies

Act, 2013

Order delivered on 14.11.2025

CORAM:

JUSTICE RAMALINGAM SUDHAKAR

HON’BLE PRESIDENT

HYBRID HEARING (PHYSICAL & VC)

PRESENT:

For the Applicant : Mr. Deepak Khosla, Advocate

For the RP : Mr. Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate along with

Mr. Deep Roy, Mr. Anuj Lakhotiya

For the Respondent(s) : (Appearance not marked)

ORDER

New Cont. P46/2025

1. The present Contempt Petition was filed on 06.11.2025 and certain defects were pointed out by the Registry. The petitioner’s counsel was

requested by Registry to rectify the defects. The defects are as follows:

1. Section mismatch between the details entered

online and those mentioned in the uploaded PDF.

2. Every page of the petition and annexures required

signatures and “True Copy” certification.

3. Brief synopsis was missing.

4. List of dates and events was missing.

5. Pagination was not in proper sequence or was

2. On the request of Ld. Counsel Mr. Deepak Khosla, on 07.11.2025, the Contempt Petition was listed under defects as Cont. P./D09689/2025 at Item No. 401 unnumbered and the following orders was passed:

“Ld. Counsel Mr. Deepak Khosla for the applicant appeared and is directed to ensure that the application is cured of all defects and is numbered, so that the same may be listed.”

3. As per the Registry report dated 13.11.2025 placed before me today from among the defects pointed out at the time of registration, the following defects that are yet to be rectified:

1. Section mismatch between online filing and PDF version. 2. Signatures required on every page of the Contempt Petition and “True Copy” certification on all annexures.

3. Brief synopsis still missing.

4. List of dates and events still missing.

5. Proof of service not uploaded.

6. Vakalatnama not filed.

4. It appears from the Registry report that Ld. Counsel Mr. Deepak Khosla has made an endorsement which reads as follows:

1. Proof of Service: The counsel requested exemption from prior service because Ex parte (one-sided) orders were being sought, stating, “Hence, no proof of service is being filed – please put up before the Bench with your objections (if any.)”

2. Synopsis and List of Dates: The counsel asserted that these were unnecessary because the petition itself was very brief and served as its own synopsis, directing the Registry to “Pls put up as it is, with your objections, if any.”

5. The matter is listed today at Item No. 103. On the defects pointed out by the Registry, Ld. Counsel Mr. Deepak Khosla has undertaken to file vakalatnama, brief synopsis and list of dates and he refers to his endorsement. I have considered the same.

6. Since, it is a Contempt Petition, the petitioner is directed to comply with all the defects pointed out by the registry without fail. If any defect remains without rectification the same to be mentioned with a report at the time of

7. List the matter for hearing on 19.11.2025 -Sd/-

(RAMALINGAM SUDHAKAR)

PRESIDENT

14.11.2025 Fatima