SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 6525

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Bennett Coleman and Company Limited VS


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:KHAITAN AND CO LLP

In the matter of the Companies Act,

2013 ; AND

In the matter of

Sections 230 to Section 232 of the

Companies Act, 2013 and other

applicable provisions of the Companies

Act, 2013

read with Companies (Compromises,

Arrangements and Amalgamation)

Rules, 2016;

AND

In the matter of

The Scheme of Arrangement

Between

Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited

(Demerged Company)

With

Times Horizon Private Limited

(Resulting Company)

And their respective Shareholders and

Creditors.

Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited

[CIN: U22120MH1913PLC000391] ... First Petitioner Company

Times Horizon Private Limited

[CIN: U60200MH2025PTC443127] ... Second Petitioner Company

Order delivered on 19.11.2025

Coram:

Shri. Prabhat Kumar Shri Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey Hon’ble Member (Technical) Hon’ble Member (Judicial)

Appearances :

For the Applicant(s) : Adv. Mehul Shah a/w Adv.

Peshwan Jehangir, Adv. Rushabh Gala, Adv. Roselin Alex, Adv. Palak Vashisth and Adv. Kashvi Shetty i/b Khaitan & Co for the Applicant Companies.

ORDER

1. The present Composite Scheme of Arrangement between Bennett, Coleman & Company Limited (“First Applicant Company” or “Demerged Company” or “BCCL”) and Times Horizon Private Limited (“Second Applicant Company” or “Resulting C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top