SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 6749

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Shri Prabhat Kumar, Member (Technical), Shri Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey, Member (Judicial)
Chronos Properties Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited – Respondent
CA 262/2024 in CP No. 3638/(MB)/2018 | CA 194/2025 in CP No. 3638/(MB)/2018 | CA 208/2025 in CP No. 3638/(MB)/2018



For the Appellants/Petitioners:Sr. Advocate Janak Dwarkadas, Advocates Ritvik Kulkarni & Benaisha Hansatia
For the Respondents:Sr. Advocate Zal Andhyarujina, with Advocates Kuber Dewan, Neeharika Aggarwal, Kaustubh Srivastava, & Naomi Ting, Advocates Aditya Sikka and Onshi Jakhar

The Letter of Intent is a binding contract with specified terms, and unilateral amendments must align with stipulated conditions; non-renewal of Performance Guarantee does not result in automatic disqualification of the bidder.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 2013 - Section 241-242 - Letter of Intent - Chronos Properties Private Limited sought directions for executing a Definitive Agreement based on a binding LoI for property purchase from IL&FS. IL&FS attempted unilateral amendment to raise compensation. Court found LoI a concluded contract, rejecting IL&FS's amendment claim. (Paras 1, 8, 23-24)

(B) Unilateral Powers - The court held that IL&FS's alleged unilateral right to amend the contract is valid only under specified conditions of the LoI and Resolution Framework objectives. (Paras 23-24)

(C) Performance Guarantee - Applicant’s failure to renew the Performance Guarantee was not sufficient for disqualification from the bidding process; they were allowed to reaffirm their compliance. (Paras 43-48)

Facts of the case:
Chronos Properties was the successful bidder for the IL&FS Financial Centre at Bandra Kurla Complex with the approved bid of INR 1080 Crores. Disputes arose over a unilateral amendment by IL&FS to increase the bid amount based on a property valuation increase.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the LoI was a binding contractual agreement, supporting the claim for executing a Definitive Agreement.

Issues: Whether the LoI constituted a concluded contract; the validity of IL&FS's unilateral right to amend the LoI; and whether Chronos was disqualified due to the non-renewal of the Performance Guarantee.

Ratio Decidendi: The LoI contained all essential terms to be enforceable as a contract. IL&FS’s power to amend is not unfettered and is subject to specific outlined objectives; thus their attempted amendment was invalid post-approval.

Result: Applications disposed of favorably for Chronos.

Table of Content
1. chronos as successful bidder for il&fs property (Para 1 , 2)
2. chronos seeks directions regarding performance guarantees. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. il&fs argues for value maximization and unilateral amendment rights. (Para 7 , 19)
4. loi as binding contract with essential terms. (Para 8 , 11 , 12)
5. il&fs's claimed unilateral rights under the loi. (Para 24 , 26 , 33)
6. chronos retains performance guarantee obligations despite amendments. (Para 36 , 48)
7. final decision and directions regarding contract execution. (Para 49)

ORDER

CA 262/2024 in CP No. 3638/(MB)/2018

1) A Company Application 262 of 2024, is filed on 06.08.2024, by the Chronos Properties Private Limited (‘Chronos’), who is Successful Bidder for IL&FS Financial Centre at Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai and holding a Letter of Intent dt. 21.03.2022 (‘LoI’) issued by IL&FS in this relation. Chronos is seeking certain directions to IL&FS for execution of a Definitive Agreement and consummation of the Transaction pursuant to said LoI.

2) Chronos has sought directions to the Respondents, viz. IL&FS and another to take all the steps necessary to execute, sign and register the Definitive Agreement before the relevant Authorities and take steps necessary to ensure the consummation of the Proposed Transaction as contemplated in the LoI and for quashing and setting aside the letter dt. 16.08.2024, by which the unilateral amendment to the LoI, enhancing the consideration of the proposed Transaction of sale of the property was made by IL&FS.

3) The brief facts leading to the filing of this Company Application are as under:

a. Pursuant to the Resolution Framework of the Respondent No.1, viz. IL&FS as approved by the Hon’ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal vide its Order dt. 12.03.2020, IL&FS sought proposal for acquisition of its rights in the IL&FS Financial Centre and underlying Land located at Bandra Kurla Complex (hereinafter referred to as the Property).

b. Chronos affiliate emerged as the Successful Bidder. After negotiations, the Bid was finalised for INR 1080 Crores. As per the mechanism provided in the Framework, the approval was required from various Authorities. The IL&FS Committee of Creditors (i.e. CoC), approved the said Bid on 17.12.2021. The New Board of IL&FS approved on 27.01.2022. The approval was also granted by the Hon’ble (Retired) Justice Shri. D.K. Jain (‘Justice Jain’) on 08.03.2022. After the approval from Justice Jain, the LoI was executed between the Parties on 21.03.2022, and as per the said LoI, Chronos was required to furnish Performance Guarantee of INR 1080 Crores i.e. 10% of the consideration, which was executed. This Tribunal, vide its Order dt. 23.09.2022, also granted its approval to the proposed Transaction. Thereafter, MMRDA also accorded sanction vide its Letter dt. 16.04.2024 to the proposed Transaction for its consummation within 90 days viz. 15.07.2024. The said consent was further extended vide Letter dt. 06.06.2024, with validity till 04.09.2024. MMRDA approval was obtained on 18.07.2024.

c. Chronos obtained stamped adjudication of the Deed of Assignment and also took inspection of Original Documents available with IL&FS on 26.06.2024, and thereafter, requested the IL&FS to execute the Definitive Agreement, however, IL&FS did not respond. Therefore, the Applicant was constrained to file main Application inter alia seeking directions against IL&FS to consummate the proposed Transaction on 16.08.2024.

d. The IL&FS issued unilateral amendment purporting to enhance the compensation to INR 1481 Crores and therefore, the present Application, contending that the IL&FS cannot unilaterally amend the consideration on the ground that there is enhancement of prices of the property and the object of the Framework being the value maximization.

e. It is contended that the LoI is a concluded contract between the Parties and is not a contingent one, therefore, it is enforceable contract. It is a binding contract, as all the essential ter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top