SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 8030

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Brajendra Mani Tripathi, J, Man Mohan Gupta, T
Employees Provident Fund Organization – Appellant
Versus
Anil Agrawal Liquidator STL Exports Pvt Ltd – Respondent
IA/219(MP)2025 TP 174 of 2019 | CP(IB) 426 of 2018



Advocates:
For the Applicant: Ms. Darshana Baghel, Adv. (EPFO)
For the Respondent: Mr. Rishabh S. Khemuka, Adv. a.w. Mr. Anil Agrawal, CA

Claims for statutory dues must be submitted before the commencement of liquidation; assessments thereafter are inadmissible under insolvency laws.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 60(5) - Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Statutory dues - The Applicant sought admission of claim for provident fund dues amounting to Rs. 44,10,204/- and contended its statutory priority over liquidation estate - The court considered whether claims arose from assessments made after commencement of liquidation proceedings were maintainable under law. (Paras 1-3, 9-21)

(B) Claim submissions - It was noted that claims were made subsequent to the liquidation commencement date and therefore inadmissible - The court ruled that procedural timelines under IB Code do not apply to statutory obligations, but claims must be filed on or before the liquidation commencement date. (Paras 10-13)

(C) Liquidation proceedings - The liquidation process had been concluded and distributions made, thus belated claims undermined the sanctity of the insolvency resolution process and were deemed inadmissible. (Paras 21-23)

Facts of the case:
The Applicant submitted statutory claims post-liquidation initiation, asserting first charge priority for provident fund dues while the Liquidator rejected them based on procedural delays and timing.

Findings of Court:
The court confirmed that claims from assessments post-liquidation cannot be entertained. The Applicant's contention was found to contradict established legal principles on claims priority.

Issues: The main issues addressed were the timeliness of claims submission and the admissibility of claims based on assessments made post-liquidation commencement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that any assessment or claim arising after the liquidation commencement is invalid, reinforcing the legislative intent behind the IB Code.

Result: IA No. 219 (MP) of 2025 in TP 174 of 2019 [CP (IB) 426 of 2018] is dismissed and disposed of.

Table of Content
1. interlocutory application under insolvency laws for pf dues. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. claims based on assessments made after liquidation commencement. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 10)
3. court's observations on claims validity. (Para 8 , 9)
4. court ruling on inadmissibility of post-liquidation claims. (Para 21)
5. final ruling on claims dismissal. (Para 22 , 23)

JUDGEMENT

1. This Interlocutory Application is filed on 05.05.2025, under Section 60 (5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the IB Code, 2016), read with Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 (the NCLT Rules, 2016) by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, EPFO, Gwalior (the Applicant) against Mr Anil Agrawal (the Respondent), Liquidator of M/s STL Exports Pvt. Ltd. (the Corporate Debtor).

2. Through this present Application, the Applicant seeks following directions given below:

a) To direct the Respondent/Liquidator to forthwith admit and accept the statutory claim of the Applicant towards provident fund dues amounting Date of Order: 10.12.2025 to Rs. 44,10,204/- (Rupees Forty-Four Lakh Ten Thousand Two Hundred and Four only), together with Damages and accrued statutory Interest until realization.

b) To declare that the PF dues constitute a statutory first charge over the assets of the CD and stand excluded from the liquidation estate.

c) To direct the Respondent/Liquidator to earmark and disburse the aforesaid PF dues, along with Damages and accrued statutory Interest, on a priority and prior to any distribution of proceeds under Section 53 of the IB Code, 2016.

d) To restrain the Respondent/Liquidator from effecting any distribution of the proceeds or assets of the CD to any other creditors or stakeholders until the statutory provident fund dues, along with Damages and interest, are fully paid and discharged.

e) To pass an order Condoning any procedural delays, if any, in filing or adjudication of the present Application, in the interest of justice and equity.

3. The Applicant’s case in brief is:

a) The Applicant submits that Shri Vivek Kumar Gupta, Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, EPFO, Regional Office, Gwalior was duly authorised to file the present application.

(Copy of the resolution passed by CBT dated 25.05.1989 is annexed and marked as ANNEXURE A1 to the Application.)

b) The Applicant submits that in IA No. 186 (MP) 2021 in TP 174 of 2019 (CP (IB) 426 of 2018), this Adjudicating Authority, passed a liquidation order dated 11.08.2023 under Section 33 (2) of the IB Code, 2016 and Date of Order: 10.12.2025 appointed the Respondent as the Liquidator.

c) The Applicant submits that the EPF dues constitute statutory liabilities and not contractual debts. Hence, Provident Fund, Gratuity, and Pension Fund dues stand excluded from the liquidation estate in terms of Section 36 of the IB Code, 2016, and are not governed by the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016.

d) The Applicant submits that, if any procedural delay is observed in filing or updating the claim, this Adjudicating Authority may be pleased to condone the same, the delay having occurred due to assessment proceedings and procedural difficulties.

e) The Applicant submits that the PF dues are statutory in nature, protected under the Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (the EPF & MP Act, 1952), enacted to ensure social security to employees. It further submits that any minor and unintentional procedural delay ought not to defeat substantive justice or prejudice the employees legitimate statutory entitlements, who depend upon these funds for their welfare and livelihood.

f) The Applicant submits that the EPFO is a social security organization governed by its own Act, the EPF & MP Act, 1952. The Corporate Debtor/CD is covered under the EPF & MP Act, 1952 and allotted EPF Code No. MP/GWL/0010922000. The CD was legally obligated to Date of Order: 10.12.2025 comply with the EPF & MP Act, 1952 and its Schemes by timely remitting dues and submitting returns si

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top