SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 7984

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Brajendra Mani Tripathi, J, Man Mohan Gupta, T
Punjab National Bank – Appellant
Versus
M/s Shree Uttam Food Products (India) Pvt Ltd – Respondent
CP(IB) No. 16 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Applicant: Ms. Shraddha Chaudhari, Ms. Himani Chauhan
For the Respondent: Mr. P. M. Chaudhari, Mr. Anand Prabhawalkar, Ms. Yashi Maheshwari

The court held that an application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process is admissible if it proves default beyond the minimum threshold, irrespective of disputes over debt amounts.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 7 - The Financial Creditor brought an application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor for defaulting on debts exceeding the threshold limit. The Corporate Debtor raised issues on limitation, different amounts, and validity of documents in its defense. The Adjudicating Authority ruled that the petition is complete, within limitation, and the claimed default amount exceeds the required threshold under section 4 of the IBC. The General Power of Attorney was held valid for the purposes of the claim. (Paras 1-12, 14-18)

(B) Application - Compliance and admission criteria - The authority confirmed that it must admit an application if the conditions in Section 7(5) are satisfied, focusing on existence of default and procedural completeness without delving into disputes regarding debt amounts. (Paras 15, 16)

Facts of the case:
The petition was filed due to defaults in repayment amounting to Rs. 23,91,36,802/- against the Corporate Debtor, which operated in cold chain facilities and processing of fruits and vegetables. Payment default led to classification as Non-Performing Asset. The applicant complied with required procedural stipulations for initiation of CIRP.

Findings of Court:
The default was established, and the operational factors supported the continuation of the application, affirming its validity for CIRP initiation under the IBC. The court also recognized the need for procedural adherence regarding the powers delegated to the applicant following the amalgamation of banks.

Issues: Key concerns included the compliance with filing timelines, the validity of the appropriated documents, and adherence to the financial threshold for proceeding with the application under the IBC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court stressed the limited role at the admission stage, reiterating that disputes related to debt amounts do not prevent the admission of an application under Section 7, provided other criteria are met. (Paras 14-18)

Result: The application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor was admitted.

Table of Content
1. financial creditor filed a petition under ibc citing defaults. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. corporate debtor contested based on limitation and document validity. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10)
3. court's role is limited to assessing default and procedural compliance. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. application for cirp allowed. (Para 18)

ORDER

1. This Company Petition has been filed by Punjab National Bank (“Financial Creditor”), seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s Shree Uttam Food Products Private Limited (“Corporate Debtor”) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) read with Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 for having committed a default in payment of its outstanding debts amounting Rs.23,91,36,802/- as on 31st January, 2024 and penal interest.

The date of default is stated to be 04.01.2020.

2. Perusal of Part-I of the Form-1 indicates that the Financial Creditor is a Bank/ Financial Institution. The Head office of the Financial Creditor is situated at Plot No. 4, Sector 10, Dwarka, New Delhi-110075. This petition has been filed through Chief Manager Shri Rajesh Kumar Thakur, who has been authorised by Power of Attorney dated 27.12.2011(Annexure-A3).

3. Perusal of Part-II of the Form-1 indicates that the Corporate Debtor is one M/s Shree Uttam Food Products (India) Private Limited having CIN No. U15400MP2012PTC029466. The registered office of the Corporate Debtor is situated at Flat No. 1 Bansi Plaza 581 MG Road, Indore, Madhya Pradesh – 462001.

4. Perusal of Part-III of the Form-1 indicates that the applicant has nominated Mr. Kuldeep Tank, Insolvency Professional, having Registration No. IBBI/IPA-001/IP 02776/2022-2023/14255 to act as Interim Resolution Professional (“IRP”). The proposed IRP has given written communication Form-2 dated 24.01.2024 as per the requirement of Rule 9(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules,2016 (Annexure-A2) being AFA valid up to 06.02.2024. On perusal of IBBI website it was found that the AFA of the proposed IRP is valid up to 30.06.2026.

5. Perusal of Part-IV and Part-V of the Form-1 revealed that the Financial Creditor has placed the facts through this petition in the following manner:-

i. The Corporate Debtor is a corporate entity engaged in the operation of integrated cold chain facilities cum fruits and vegetables processing unit for value addition and natural preservation of fruits and vegetables and manufacturing/ processing of frozen, freeze dried and mechanically dried fruits and vegetables.

ii. It is stated that the respondent has submitted loan application form dated 15.12.2013 for financial assistance to the Applicant/Financial Creditor for the purpose of financing the Corporate Debtor’s project for implementation of integrated cold chain facilities cum F&V processing unit at village Bamniya, Tehsil Petlawad, District Jhabhua at Madhya Pradesh.

iii. The Applicant/ Financial Creditor sanctioned Term Loan of Rs. 1500 Lakhs and CC Limits to the tune of Rs. 500 Lakhs, vide Sanction letter dated 29.01.2014(Annexure-V).

iv. The Applicant/ Corporate Debtor and its guarantors have executed following documents to secure the said credit limits:

 Letter of Acceptance dated 30.01.2014 (Annexure-A6).

 The Board Resolution Regulation dated 30.01.2014 (Annexure-A7) along with the Letter of Undertaking dated 30.01.2014(Annexure-A8).

 Agreement for Term Loan dated 04.03.2014 (Annexure- A9) for the repayment of Rs. 1500 Lakhs with interest 12%p.a.

 Agreement of Hypothecation of goods and book debts to secure cash credit dated 04.03.2014 (Annexure-A10) for repayment of Rs. 500 Lakhs with interest at rate of 1.25% over/ below prevailing base rate.

 Hypothecation of goods to secure a demand cash credit/ working capital dated 04.03.2014 (Annexure-A11) for repayment of Rs. 500 Lakhs with interest at rate of 2% over/ below prevailing base rate.

 Hy

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top