Back
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Vinay Goel, Judicial Member
Jatayupara Tourism Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Dhanlaxmi Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. alleged disobedience of status quo on project funds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioners allege wilful contempt violation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. bank denies knowledge and prior service. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 26) |
| 4. dispute over fund ownership and restoration. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. lapse in diligence but funds restored. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. no strict proof of wilful contempt; petitions dismissed. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
ORDER
1. These Contempt Petitions, namely Contempt Petition (C/ACT)/04/KOB/2024 and Contempt Petition (C/ACT)/05/KOB/2024, are filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Section 425 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016, arising out of MA (C/ACT)/13/KOB/2024 in CP (C/ACT)/21/KOB/2020, alleging wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 07.10.2024 passed by this Tribunal. Contempt Petition (C/ACT)/04/KOB/2024 has been filed by Jatayupara Tourism Private Limited, the applicant in the Miscellaneous Application against Respondents 1 to 7 herein, who include parties to the Company Petition as well as third parties, including Dha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
