Back
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Bidisha Banerjee, Judicial Member, Siddharth Mishra, Technical Member
CASTLE CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MADHUR VYAPAR PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. scheme of amalgamation details and parties (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. shareholder and creditor consents dispensed (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. compliance with prior directions and reports (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. benefits of amalgamation for nbfcs (Para 17) |
| 5. regulatory notices and no-objections received (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. rd observations addressed by petitioners (Para 23) |
| 7. scheme sanctioned with transfer provisions (Para 24) |
| 8. post-order compliance directions (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
ORDER
Per: Cmde Siddharth Mishra, Member (Technical)
1. The Court convened through hybrid mode.
2. The instant Company Petition has been filed in the second stage of the proceedings under Section 230(6) read with Section 232(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) for sanction and confirmation of the Scheme of Amalgamation of the Scheme of Amalgamation of the Scheme of Amalgamation of the Scheme of Amalgamation of the Scheme of Amalgamation of the Scheme of Amalgamation of the Scheme of Amalgamation of
With MADHUR VYAPAR PRIVATE LIMITED- Transferee Company / Petitioner No 4, from the Appointed Date 1st April, 2024.
A copy of the said Scheme of Amalgamation (“Scheme”) is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
