SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 160

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
ARORA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ltd. & Ors. – Respondent
COMP.APPL - 8/2023



Advocates:
For the Petitioner:RAHUL TOTALA

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL COURT ROOM NO. 1, MUMBAI BENCH Item No. 51 CA 136/2022, COMP.APPL/334(MB)2025, COMP.APPL/372(MB)2025 IA(COMPANIES.ACT)/120(MB )2025 IA(COMPANIES.ACT)/65(MB) 2025, IA(COMPANIES.ACT)/211(MB)2025, COMP.APPL/102/2021, COMP.APPL/ 03/2020, COMP.APPL/ 4103/2019, COMP.APPL/ 8/2023, CA

181/2022 & CA 190/2022 In CP/3638(MB)2018 CORAM:

SH. PRABHAT KUMAR SH. SUSHIL MAHADEORAO KOCHEY HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL) HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING ON 08.01.2026 NAME OF THE PARTIES: UNION OF INDIA V/s INFRASTRUCTURE LEASING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. & ORS.

Section 241- 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 11 of NCLT

ORDER

1. Adv. Gaurav Sharma for Respondent No. 16 in CA 190/22, CA 181/2022.

Adv. Sneha Barange and Adv. Parag Kabra i/b DSK Legal for Respondent No. 7 and Respondent No. 11 in CA 190/2022, Adv. PULKIT SHARMA, Adv. Harsh Kesharia for Respondent No. 12 In CA/181/2022, CA/334/2025 - for Respondent No. 1 - Adv. Aakanksha Bhola, Adv. Shankari Mishra for Applicant in IA 120/2025, CA 190/2022. Adv. Shantanu Chaturvedi for Respondent No. 5, CA 181 of 2022- Honey Chandnani I/b Rajani Associates for Respondent No. 8, CA 190/2022. Adv. Harpal Singh for Respondent No. 4, CA 190/2022, Adv. Saurabh Bachhawat a/w Adv. Kaushik Puranik i/b Chandhiok & Mahajan, For Respondent 9, Mr. Aditya Sikka a/w Ms. Onshi Jakhar for the Union of India and CA 181/2020, Adv. Tine Abraham, Adv. Shourya Bari and Adv. Meghana Senthil Kumar, For Respondent No. 4 present through VC. Ms.

Pallavi Parmar for Applicants in CA no. 334/2025, CA 136 of 2022: Adv Aastha Mathur for Applicant, Adv. Amit Singh a/w Adv. Bhushan Bhadgale, Adv. Abhay Nevagi for the Respondent No. 6 and 10, Adv. Farnaaz Karbhari for the Respondents, Adv. Niket Mehta, Adv. Animesh Bisht, Adv. Keshav Bansal for the IL&FS, ITNL, IECCL, ITPCL, IEISL, Adv. Anuj Lokhotiya for the Advisor GT Bharat LLP and Adv. Vishal Shriyan a/w Adv. Aditya Seetharaman for the Respondent present.

CA 136/2022

1. Learned counsel for the Applicant seeks time stating that arguing counsel is not available.

2. List this matter on 21.01.2026 for further consideration.

COMP.APPL/334(MB)2025

1. Learned counsel for the Applicant informs that the reply from Respondent No. 1 was served yesterday and seeks time to place on record rejoinder.

Time granted. Rejoinder be filed within one weeks.

2. List this matter on 21.01.2026 for further consideration.

COMP.APPL/372(MB)2025

1. This Application i.e. CA 372/2025 has been filed by Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited. (“Applicant”) under Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 seeking following reliefs:

A. Direct and permit the Indian Applicant Group Companies set out at Annexure 5, Annexure 11, Annexure 15, and Annexure 19 to prepare, finalize and audit their financial statements required under Section 129 of the Act and hold their respective AGMs and present such audited financial statements to the shareholders of the respective company as follows:

a) FY 2020 -2021 - December 31,2025 b) FY 2021 -2022 - December 31,2025 c) FY 2022 -2023 - December 31,2025 d) FY 2023 -2024 - December 31,2025 B. Condone the delay in holding the AGMs for FY 2020 - 2021 for the entities set out in Annexure 6,7 and 8 to the present Application, for FY 2021-2022 for entities set out at Annexure 12 to the Application, for FY 2022-2023 for entities set out at Annexure 16.

C. the term of office for the additional director of the Indian Applicant Group Entities who has been appointed under Section 161(l) of the Act shall stand extended till such extended date for the AGM; and.

D. Direct that no adverse actions including penalties be imposed against the compliant directors/ Nominee directors of the Indian Applicant Group Companies who have defaulted in complying with the statutory obligations and holding the AGMs within the prescribed timeline as per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

E. For any further reliefs as this Hon’ble Tribunal deems f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top