SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 242

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Prabhat Kumar, Member (Technical), Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey, Member (Judicial)
Punjab National Bank – Appellant
Versus
Pankaj Mahajan – Respondent
CP (IB)/3143(MB)/2019|IA 2913/2025



Advocates:
For the Applicant: Adv. Ankur Kumar, Adv. Saniya Anjum, Adv. Komal
For the Respondent: Adv. Ayush Rajani

RP cannot unilaterally reclassify creditor from secured financial to unsecured; creditor with corporate guarantee (financial debt) and concurrent pledge security for same debt qualifies as secured financial creditor.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Sections 5(7), 5(8), 5(8)(i), 52, 53, 60(5) - Corporate guarantee and pledge of shares by corporate debtor to secure loans to subsidiary - Resolution Professional reclassified creditor's claim from secured financial creditor to unsecured financial creditor relying on legal opinion - Held, RP lacks authority to unilaterally reclassify claims already categorized during CIRP; creditor holding both guarantee obligations (unsecured financial debt) and security interest (pledge) qua same debt entitled to classification as secured financial creditor to balance voting rights and security enforcement. (Paras 16-17, 27)

(B) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - RP's powers - RP/IRPs authorized to collate claims and constitute CoC but cannot change status of creditor post-categorization, e.g., from financial creditor to non-financial or secured to unsecured; such changes require Tribunal adjudication. (Para 16)

(C) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Financial creditor vs secured creditor - Person with only security interest (pledge/mortgage) over corporate debtor's assets not financial creditor absent direct disbursement and time value of money; however, concurrent guarantee (financial debt) and pledge (security interest) for same debt qualifies as secured financial debt. (Paras 19-23)

Facts of the case:
Financial creditor advanced loans to subsidiary of corporate debtor, secured by corporate guarantee and pledge of 51% shares in subsidiary held by corporate debtor's predecessor (merged entity). Claim initially accepted as secured financial creditor; later reclassified as unsecured by RP based on legal opinion citing Supreme Court precedents. Creditor filed application challenging reclassification.

Findings of Court:
RP directed to recognize creditor as secured creditor to extent of security interest; reclassification set aside; creditor list and CIRP records to be corrected; rights under Sections 52 and 53 applicable.

Issues: Whether RP can unilaterally reclassify creditor from secured financial to unsecured financial; whether holder of corporate guarantee plus pledge qualifies as secured financial creditor.

Ratio Decidendi: RP exceeds authority by reclassifying accepted claims; creditor with guarantee (financial debt u/s 5(8)(i)) and concurrent pledge security for same debt classified as secured financial creditor, reconciling participation in CoC and enforcement rights, distinguishing pure security holders.

Result: Application allowed.

Table of Content
1. application seeks secured creditor recognition in cirp. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. loan facilities secured by pledge and corporate guarantee. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. rp reclassifies pnb claim as unsecured; objection raised. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. rp lacks authority to reclassify creditor status. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
5. security interest alone excludes financial creditor status. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. guarantee creates financial debt; concurrent secured creditor. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
7. pledge and guarantee secure same restructured debt. (Para 26)
8. applicant classified as secured financial creditor. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)

Arshiya Limited …Corporate Debtor Order delivered on: 12.01.2026 Coram Shri Prabhat Kumar Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey Hon’ble Member (Technical) Hon’ble Member (Judicial)

Appearances:

CP (IB)/ 3143 (MB) 2019 For the Applicant : Adv. Ankur Kumar a/w Adv.

Saniya Anjum and Adv. Komal For the Respondent : Adv. Ayush Rajani ORDER

1. The present interlocutory application IA 2913 of 2025 is filed on 11.6.2025 under Section 60(5) of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”) by Punjab National Bank (“the Applicant/ PNB”) against Pankaj Mahajan, Resolution Professional (“Respondent/RP”) in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) of Arshiya Limited (“Corporate Debtor”) seeking a direction from this Tribunal to declare and recognize the status of the Applicant as a secured creditor in the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor carried in terms of Order passed in Company Petition No. 3143 of 2019, filed under Section 7 of the Code. The Applicant has prayed the following:

a. Allow the present Application;

b. Direct the Respondent to treat and recognize the Applicant as a secured creditor in the CIRP of Corporate Debtor in respect of the amount secured by way of pledge agreement dated 09.09.2010;

c. Declare that the reclassification of the Applicant's claim by Respondent as an unsecured financial creditor is erroneous and contrary to the provisions of the code, and hence need to be set aside;

d. Pass such further or other order(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.

2. The Applicant is a Financial Creditor in respect of the credit facilities sanctioned and disbursed to Arshiya Northern FTWZ Limited (“ANFL” / “Principal Borrower”), which is the subsidiary company of Corporate Debtor.

CP (IB)/ 3143 (MB) 2019

3. Mr. Nitin Vishwanath Panchal was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor by this Tribunal vide Order dated 23.04.2024 passed in CP (IB)/ 3143 (MB) 2019. Thereafter Mr. Pankaj Mahajan i.e., the Respondent herein, was appointed as the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor vide order dated

25.09.2024 passed in IA No. 4395 of 2024.

4. The Applicant sanctioned a Loan of Rs. 100 crores on 27th October, 2009.

5. Thereafter, ANFL was sanctioned the loan facilities for an aggregate principal amount not exceeding Rs.280,37,00,000/- (Rupees Two Hundred and Eighty Crores and Thirty Seven Lakhs Only) by the consortium of banks, viz. PNB, State Bank of India ("SBI"), AXIS Bank Limited ("AXIS"), State Bank of Patiala ("SBoP"), State Bank of Travancore ("SBT"), and State Bank of Mysore (“SBM”) and a ‘Common Loan Agreement’ and ‘Trust and Retention Account Agreement’ among Borrower, Consortium Lenders, PNB as Lenders’ Agent and PNB Investment ,Services Limited as well as ‘Lender’s Agent Agreement’ and ‘Inter-Creditors Agreement’ among Consortium Lenders, PNB as Lenders’ Agent and PNB Investment Services Limited both dated 7th May, 2010 were entered into. These facilities were secured by Corporate Guarantee by M/s. Arshiya International Limited (subsequently merged into Corporate Debtor) and M/s Arshiya FWTZ Limited vide deed dated 7th May, 2010 as well as Pledge Agreement and Deed of Hypothecation both dated 9th September, 2010. The share of each consortium lender in the aggregate credit facilities was as follows :

CP (IB)/ 3143 (MB) 2019

6. The Consortiu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top