NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Manisha Agarwal VS
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL COURT ROOM NO. 1, MUMBAI SINGLE BENCH Item No. 38 RULE 63 APPEAL/9(MB )2026 IN Main Filing No. 2709138094672025 CORAM: SH. SUSHIL MAHADEORAO KOCHEY HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING ON 14.01.2026 NAME OF THE PARTIES: MANISHA AGARWAL Sec 66(1) Rule 63 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ________________________________________________________________
ORDER
1) Adv. Pratik Panday for the Appellant is present
2) Heard Ld. Counsel for the Appellant there is no proper justification for explaining the delay of 26 days in filing this appeal. It is submitted that there where the clear copy of the Financial Statements, are not available and therefore could not be complied. However, considering the submissions of circumstances One last opportunity is granted to be removed the objections.
3) However, considering that there is no justifiable ground made out for condoning the delay imposition of costs could be justified.
4) It has not been disputed that the objections were duly notified by the Registry to the Appellant, however, in spite of that there was total inaction on the part of the Appellant and the objections were not removed on time.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.