SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 347

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Rammurti Kushawaha, Judicial Member, Yogendra Kumar Singh, Technical Member
Maxim Infrastructure & Real Estate Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
CP(IB)/4/GB/2018|IA(IBC)/176/GB/2024



Advocates:
For Petitioner: Mr. A. Gaggar, Ms. V. Sureka
For Respondents: Mr. B. N. Gogoi

Approved resolution plan under IBC Section 31(1) extinguishes all pre-CIRP unsubmitted statutory dues; tax reassessment proceedings post-approval are barred by Section 238's overriding effect and clean slate doctrine.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Sections 31(1), 60(5), 238 - Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148A, 148 - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Resolution plan approved under Section 31(1) - Upon approval, all claims not part of plan, including statutory dues of Central Government for pre-CIRP period, stand extinguished - No proceedings for reassessment or recovery of such dues can be initiated post-approval - Section 238 gives IBC overriding effect over Income Tax Act - 'Clean slate' doctrine ensures revival of corporate debtor free from pre-insolvency liabilities - Statutory authorities failing to submit claims during CIRP cannot revive extinguished dues via reassessment notices - Show cause notice, order and notice under Sections 148A(d) and 148 quashed as null and void. (Paras 9-29)

(B) Resolution Plan - Binding nature - Terms binding on corporate debtor, employees, members, creditors including Central/State Governments and local authorities - Unsubmitted claims during CIRP deemed waived/extinguished per plan provisions - Post-approval initiation of tax proceedings contravenes finality under Section 31(1). (Paras 14-16, 25)

Facts of the case:
Corporate debtor's CIRP initiated on 31.08.2018 - Public announcements issued inviting claims - Respondent statutory authority failed to submit claim - Resolution plan approved on 25.10.2019 waiving all pre-CIRP statutory dues at nil value - Post-approval, respondent issued show cause notice dated 12.08.2024 under Section 148A(b) alleging escaped income for AY 2018-19, followed by order under Section 148A(d) and notice under Section 148 both dated 31.08.2024 - Corporate debtor filed application under Section 60(5) seeking quashing - Respondent proceeded ex parte after failing to file reply.

Findings of Court:
Resolution plan approved on 25.10.2019 given full effect - All impugned notices and order issued by respondent quashed and set aside as null and void - Respondent bound by plan terms and barred from reassessment proceedings for pre-CIRP period.

Issues: Whether post-approval reassessment proceedings under Income Tax Act for pre-CIRP escaped income are maintainable despite resolution plan extinguishing unsubmitted statutory claims; scope of 'clean slate' doctrine and overriding effect of IBC.

Ratio Decidendi: Approved resolution plan attains finality under Section 31(1), extinguishing all non-incorporated pre-CIRP claims including statutory dues; Section 238 overrides inconsistent tax provisions - Statutory authorities cannot circumvent plan by post-approval reassessments, ensuring corporate debtor's revival on clean slate without hydra-headed liabilities.

Result: Application allowed.

Table of Content
1. tax notices quashed; plan fully implemented. (Para 1 , 2)

Shri Yogendra Kumar Singh : Member (Technical)

Appearances (through video conferencing):

For Petitioner : Mr. A. Gaggar (Adv.), Ms. V. Sureka (Adv.)

For Respondents : Mr. B. N. Gogoi, Adv Order pronounced on: 15.01.2026 As Per Bench

1. The present application is filed under Section 60(5) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”), r/w Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016, by Maxim Infrastructure & Real Estate Private Limited (“Applicant/Corporate Debtor”) seeking the following reliefs:

a. Set aside the Show Cause Notice No. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2024-

25/1067573713(1) dated 12th August, 2024 issued by the Respondent under Section

148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961;

In CP(IB)/4/GB/2018 ___________________________________________________________________________________________

b. Set aside and /or quash the Respondent's order vide DIN & Notice No:

ITBA/AST/F/148A/2024-25/1068212694(1) dated 31st August, 2024 issued against the Applicant under clause ( d) of Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, including any actions consequent to the said order;

c. Ad-interim order in terms of prayers above;

d. To pass such other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper;

2. Submissions on behalf of the Petitioner:

2.1. An application being CP (IB) No. 4/GB/2018 was filed by Bank of India (“Financial Creditor”) under Section 7 of the Code, against the Applicant/ Corporate Debtor, wherein this Tribunal by an order dated 31st August, 2018 initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) against the Applicant herein.

2.2. The Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant being a consortium led by M/s Rare Asset Reconstruction Limited (“Successful Resolution Applicant”) was duly confirmed by the 100% votes of Committee of Creditors (“CoC”) in the Meeting held on 26.09.2019. This Tribunal also approved the said Resolution Plan vide order dated 25.10.2019.

2.3. The IRP made a public announcement on 7th September, 2018 and again on 21st February, 2018 inviting all creditors of the Corporate Debtor to submit their claims. It was submitted that during the CIRP of the corporate debtor, the Respondent did not submit its claim to the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) or Resolution Professional (RP).

2.4. Upon replacement of IRP with the RP, the RP floated an Expression of Interest for inviting the potential Resolution Applicants to submit their Resolution Plans.

2.5. Subsequently, the resolution plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant being M/s Rare Asset Reconstruction Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Successful Resolution Applicant) was duly confirmed by the Committee of Creditors in the 14th Meeting held on 26th September, 2019. And this Tribunal also approved the said Resolution Plan vide order dated 25th October, 2019 which provided for payments to all stakeholders of the corporate debtor. Copy of the said order dated 25th October, In CP(IB)/4/GB/2018 ___________________________________________________________________________________________

2019 passed by this Hon’ble Tribunal and copy of the resolution plan are enclosed as "Annexures B and C" respectively to the petition.

2.6. Despite approval of the resolution plan, the Corporate Debtor/Applicant was shocked to receive a show-cause notice No. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2024- 25/1067573713(1) dated 12th August, 2024 from the Respondent under clause (b) of Section 148A of the Act for the period pertaining to the assessment year 2018-19, show causing as to why a notice under Section 148 of the Act should not be issued to the Applicant on the basis of information which suggested that income of Rs. 1,22,32,000/- (Rupees One Crore Twenty Two Lakh Thirty Two Thousand Only) chargeable to tax has escaped assessment in the Applicant's case for the relevant assessment year 2018-19.

A copy of the show cause notice dated 12th August, 2024 is annexed and marked as Annexure D to the petition.

2.7. The a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top