SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 454

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Nilesh Sharma, Judicial Member, Charanjeet Singh Gulati, Technical Member
Maitreya Doshi – Appellant
Versus
Kanak Jani – Respondent
IA/3117/2023|CP (IB)/1220(MB)/2020|IA (IBC) NO. 3117 OF 2023|CP (IB) NO. 1220/MB/2020



Advocates:
For the Applicant: Sr Adv. Mustfa Doctor a/w Dhanyashree Jadeja & Vanshika Shroff
For the Respondents:Adv. Abhay Petkar a/w Vikram Chaudhary (RP), Adv. Prathmesh Nirkhe (Respondent No. 2)

Sale of pledged shares by creditor during CIRP moratorium violates Section 14 despite possession transfer on invocation; ownership remains with debtor. Sold listed shares unrestorable; debt reduces by realisation amount.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Sections 7, 14, 18, 25, 60(5) - Moratorium violation - Pledged shares sold by secured creditor during moratorium - Ownership remains with corporate debtor post-pledge invocation; mere possession transfers to pledgee - Sale during moratorium violates Section 14, but sold listed shares in open market cannot be restored due to traceability issues - Amount realised from sale reduces creditor's debt for CIRP purposes. (Paras 49-51, 53, 58)

(B) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Co-borrowers - Partial recovery from one corporate debtor reduces claim against co-borrower; full discharge requires complete satisfaction - Unapproved/withdrawn resolution plan of co-borrower does not extinguish co-borrower's liability. (Paras 59-60)

(C) Pledge - Under Contract Act, 1872 Section 176 - Pledgee lacks ownership; right to sell only post-reasonable notice - Invocation transfers possession only. (Para 50)

Facts of the case:
Financial creditor advanced loan to borrower with co-borrower corporate debtor pledging shares as security. Default led to parallel Section 7 petitions; both admitted. During moratorium, creditor sold 44,19,085/53,01,000 pledged shares realising Rs.3,87,11,000. Ex-director sought to set aside CIRP, return shares/proceeds, reject resolution plan approved by sole creditor CoC.

Findings of Court:
Sale violated moratorium but restoration of sold shares infeasible; debt reduced by realisation amount for resolution plan adjustment. Unsold shares need not be returned to debtor's demat as status quo preserves security.

Issues: (i) Whether sale of pledged shares during moratorium violates IBC; (ii) Whether sold/unsold shares returnable; (iii) Whether sale proceeds deductible from creditor claim; (iv) Whether co-borrower liability extinguishes on co-debtor's unapproved plan. (Para 47)

Ratio Decidendi: Moratorium bars security enforcement including pledged share sales despite possession with pledgee; ownership vests in debtor. Open-market sales render physical restoration impractical; equitable reduction in debt by recoveries suffices without declaring sales void. Co-borrower claims adjust for actual recoveries only.

Result: IA disposed directing debt reduction to extent of sale proceeds; no return of shares or CIRP set aside.

Table of Content
1. factual background of loan, pledge, and cirp initiation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 48)
2. applicant's challenge to share sales during moratorium and resolution plan. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
3. respondents defend share sales, coc approval, and co-borrower liability. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
4. court frames key issues on moratorium violation and share restoration. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)
5. pledgee lacks ownership; share sale violates moratorium. (Para 49 , 50 , 51)
6. no restoration of sold shares; adjust debt by sale proceeds. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58)
7. co-borrower liability not extinguished without full recovery. (Para 59 , 60)
8. reduce creditor debt by realized sale amounts. (Para 61)

ORDER

IA (IBC) NO. 3117 OF 2023

1. This I.A. is filed by Mr. Maitreya Doshi, Ex - Director of Doshi Holdings Pvt. Ltd (“the Applicant”) under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC/the Code”) with the following prayers:

a. Direct that the corporate insolvency resolution process in respect of the Corporate Debtor be set aside;

b. Direct the Respondents to declare and disclose all particulars and details of the total number of shares of Premier Ltd. sold out of the Pledged Shares, i.e. 53,01,000 (fifty-three lakhs one thousand) shares of Premier Limited as pledged by the Corporate Debtor in favour of Respondent No. 2;

c. Direct Respondent No. 2 to return the custody and control of 53,01,000 (fifty three lakhs one thousand) shares of Premier Limited as pledged in its favour, to the Corporate Debtor or such of the Pledged Shares that are unsold and remain in the possession/custody of Respondent No. 2, and to do all such other acts, deed, matters and/or thing as may be necessary for effectively effectuating the transfer of custody 53,01,000 (fifty three lakhs one thousand) shares of Premier Limited in favour of the Corporate Debtor or such of the Pledged Shares that are unsold and remain in the possession/ custody of Respondent No. 2, including transferring and/or depositing the same into the demat account of the Corporate Debtor;

d. Direct Respondent No. 2 to deposit and/or pay the Corporate Debtor sums equivalent to the proceeds realised by Respondent No. 2 from the sale of some or all of the Pledged Shares, i.e. 53,01,000 (fifty-three lakhs one thousand) shares of Premier Limited;

e. Declare that the approval of the Resolution Plan submitted by Respondent No. 2 and approved by the Committee of Creditors (which is constituted by Respondent No. 2 only) is unlawful, illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and to thereafter set aside the Resolution Plan submitted by Respondent No. 2;

f. Pending hearing and final disposal of the present Application, pass an order restraining the Respondents, its directors, employees, agents, servant, officer and/or any other persons claiming through or under them from transferring, selling alienating, encumbering and/or creating any third party right, title and/or dealing with such number of the Pledged Shares, i.e. 53,01,000 (fifty three lakhs one thousand) shares of Premier Limited, that are unsold and presently in the custody of the Respondents;

g. Pending hearing and final disposal of the present Application, stay the corporate insolvency resolution process in respect of the Corporate Debtor;

h. Ad-interim reliefs in terms of prayer clauses (f) and (g) above;

i. For costs; and j. Any other orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit in the facts and circumstances Brief Facts as per the Application:

2. The Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 19.02.2021 in CP (IB) No. 1220/MB/2020, admitted the Company Petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“the Code”) filed by Anand Rathi Global Finance Limited (“Financial Creditor/Resolution Applicant/Respondent No. 2”) for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top