SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 513

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Mr Rajesh Rupani VS


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:POONAM UTEKAR

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL COURT ROOM NO. 1, MUMBAI SINGLE BENCH Item No. 07 APPEAL/23(M B)2026 in Main Filing No. 2709138040312025 CORAM: SH. SUSHIL MAHADEORAO KOCHEY HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING ON 28.01.2026 NAME OF THE PARTIES: MR RAJESH RUPANI Rule 63 of National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 ________________________________________________________________

ORDER

APPEAL/23(M B)2026 in Main Filing No. 2709138040312025

1) None present for the Appellant when the matter is called out.

2) Perused the Appeal filed by the Appellant and note sheet tendered by the Registry.

3) After perusal of an Appeal, it has been noticed that the main Petition has been filed under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which was filed long back in the year 2025 and since then, it is pending for removal of objections, such as, (i) Complete Petition is not uploaded; (ii) total claim amount is not mentioned. Objections were duly notified by the Registry to the Appellant via Email, but, objections were not removed. It is not in dispute that the objections were duly notified by the Registry to the Appellant, however, in spite of that there was total inaction on t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top