SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 985

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Rajeev Bhardwaj, J, Sanjay Puri, T
Mr. TSN Raja Liquidator, M/s VNR Infrastructure Ltd. (in Liquidation) – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India & Others – Respondent
IA No.742/2021 in CP (IB) No.12/10/HDB/2017



Advocates:
For the Applicant :Ms. JVL Bharati, Advocate alongwith Mr. TSN Raja, Liquidator
For Respondent No. 1:Mr. GP Yash Vardhan, Advocate
For Respondent No. 2:Mrs. Mummaneni Vazra Laxmi, Advocate

The liquidation process is incomplete without fulfilling statutory obligations, including comprehensive financial reporting and resolution of pending litigations, preventing the discharge of the Liquidator.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Sections 34, 35, and 53 - Regulation 45 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 - Application for discharge of Liquidator - Compliance with statutory obligations not fulfilled - Liquidation process not complete; hence, discharge not granted - Directions issued for comprehensive status report, complete financial statements, reconciliation of liquidation costs, and compliance with statutory filings. (Paras 29, 30, and 31)

(B) Liquidation Duties - The Liquidator must maintain custody, control of the liquidation estate, proper financial records, and ensure all claims and liabilities are accounted for before seeking discharge. (Paras 8, 9, and 30)

Facts of the case:
The Liquidator filed an application seeking to treat the liquidation as complete and obtain discharge. However, issues arose regarding the status of receivables, pending litigations, financial disclosures, and compliance with statutory requirements, revealing significant deficiencies and incomplete records.

Findings of Court:
The Liquidation process cannot be deemed complete until all statutory obligations are met and the liquidation estate is fully identified and realized, which has not occurred in this case.

Issues: Whether the Liquidator has satisfactorily complied with statutory obligations and can be discharged from duties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that completion of liquidation requires adherence to all statutory requirements, including comprehensive financial reporting and resolution of pending litigations, asserting that the liquidation process remains open until all matters are resolved.

Result: Application rejected; directions given for compliance.

Table of Content
1. overview of application filed and procedural issues. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. liquidation process compliance requirements. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 14)
3. financial disclosure and statutory compliance shortcomings. (Para 10 , 11 , 23 , 26 , 28)
4. arguments regarding project status and liquidator responsibilities. (Para 12 , 13 , 18 , 19 , 21)
5. conclusions on the completion of the liquidation process. (Para 29 , 30)
6. final orders and directions for compliance. (Para 31 , 32)

ORDER

1. The I.A.No. 742 of 2021 in C.P (IB) No. 12/10/HDB/2017 has been filed by Mr. T. S. N. Raja, Liquidator of M/s. VNR Infrastructure Limited (in Liquidation) (Corporate Debtor / CD), seeking the following reliefs:

i) To give necessary direction authorizing SBI, the lead consortium member who was also authorized by the consortium in the SCC meeting held on 09.11.2021 to pursue all the pending litigations both at the NCLT and NCLAT.

ii) To give direction treating the process of liquidation as complete and relieve the applicant from the current assignment.

iii) To direct the landlord Mr. Ravinder Reddy to refund the rent deposit which he is postponing for more than a month.

Background

2. At the outset, we found that the material placed on record by the Applicant suffered from certain anomalies, discrepancies, and lack of clarity, which impeded effective adjudication of the present Application.

3. In order to facilitate proper and comprehensive consideration of the issues involved, the Liquidator was directed vide Order dated 27.05.2025 to place the following information on record:

“ (i) A comprehensive list of receivables, including retention money, security deposits, and pending contractual payments, along with beneficiary details.

(ii) Details of all pending and disposed of litigations concerning the CD.

(iii) List the status of the 89 projects, referred to in the e-auction notice and specific agreements, transferred to the Successful Bidder.

(iv) A full statement of accounts from the commencement of liquidation to date, with itemised receipts and disbursements.

(v) A distribution schedule and a detailed breakdown of the fee claimed and received.

(vi) A compliance report on all statutory filings with RoC, Income Tax, and GST Authorities from FY 2013–14 onwards.”

4. In compliance with the aforesaid directions, the Liquidator filed a Compliance Affidavit dated 25.06.2025. Replies to the said affidavit have also been filed by the Respondents.

5. Since the pleadings have already been recorded in detail in the Order dated 27.05.2025, the same are not being reproduced herein for the sake of brevity.

6. The parties have also filed their respective written submissions and advanced oral arguments in support of their contentions.

Findings

7. It is undisputed that the Liquidation Order in respect of the Corporate Debtor was passed on 21.09.2017. During the course of liquidation, the Corporate Debtor was sold as a going concern pursuant to an e-auction conducted on 09.03.2020 for a total consideration of ₹12,48,70,000/- in favour of Mr. Raja Kishore, Respondent No. 2. The sale was approved by this Authority on 07.07.2021. The assets proposed to be transferred included project credentials, arbitration receivables and 89 ongoing works in progress.

8. However, sale of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern does not ipso facto result in completion of liquidation. The statutory scheme under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC/Code) mandates that the Liquidator must:

• take custody and control of the entire liquidation estate;

• maintain complete and transparent accounts;

• realise and distribute assets strictly in accordance with Section 53 ;

• ensure closure or lawful transfer of pending litigations; and

• complete all statutory compliances prior to seeking dissolution The mere fact of transfer of assets to a successful bidder cannot substitute compliance with these mandatory statutory obligations.

9. In view of certain inconsistencies and deficiencies noticed in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top