SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1172

ALLAHABAD BENCH, PRAYAGRAJ


(An application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 R/w Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016)


IA No. 108/2025


IN THE MATTER OF:

VELOCITY ENTERPRISES

Through its Proprietor Anurag Jain S/o Shri Ashok Kumar Jain

Having Its R/o:C1/2 Comfort Chalet, Chuna Bhatti, Bhopal-462016, M.P.

Having Its Regd. Office At:S-201-202, 2nd Floor, Raksha Tower, Chuna Bhatti, Bhopal-462016, Μ.Ρ.

.............APPLICANT

Versus

JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD.

Through its Managing Director,

Having Its H. Office At:J.A. House 63, Basant Lok, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi-57.

Through its IRP Bhuvan Madan 808, Padma Tower I, Rajendra Place, New Delhi-110008.

………RESPONDENT NO.1

CHIEF ENGINEER GANGA BASIN WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

Rewa, Madhya Pradesh.

………RESPONDENT NO.2

CHIEF ENGINEER (E&M) WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.

………RESPONDENT NO.3

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (E&M) RAMNAGAR, MICRO LIFT IRRIGATION PROJECT

Division Satna, Madhya Pradesh

………RESPONDENT NO.4


AND IN THE MATTER OF:

ICICI BANK LIMITED

…………FINANCIAL CREDITOR

Versus

JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED

…………CORPORATE DEBTOR


Order pronounced on: 17.03.2026


Coram:

Mr. Praveen Gupta. : Member (Judicial)

Mr. Ashish Verma : Member (Technical)


Appearances:

Sh. Udai Chandani, Adv. : For the Applicant

Dr. Farrukh Khan with : For the Res./RP

Sh. Dinkar Tiwari & Ms. Khushboo Sai Khurana, Advs.


-Sd- -Sd-


(Ashish Verma) (Praveen Gupta)

Member (Technical) Member (Judicial)


Date: 17.03.2026

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:UDAI CHANDANI
For the Respondent:Madan Mohan Dixit

ORDER

1. The present Application has been filed on 22.02.2025 by Velocity Enterprises (hereinafter referred to as the “Applicant”), under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “Code”/“IBC, 2016”) seeking appropriate directions to set aside order dated 04.12.2024 challenging the illegal termination of the Work Order dated 18.11.2022 by the Respondent No.1, Jaiprakash Associates Limited through its Interim Resolution Professional, Bhuvan Madan (hereinafter referred to as “IRP/RP”).

2. The Applicant has made the following prayers in the application:

IA No.108/2025

a. Allow the present application

b. To set aside the order dated 04.12.2024 whereby the contract has been terminated in an illegal and arbitrary manner

c. Till the final disposal of the present application the Respondent No. 1 may be restrained from taking any coercive action against the Applicant on the basis of the work order issued on 18.11.2022 bearing Reference No. JAL/HO/MP/E&M/VELOCITY/RAMNAGAR/2022.

d. Pass such other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.

3. As submitted, the Applicant is a proprietorship firm based at Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, and Respondent No.1 is a company engaged in engineering and infrastructure which had been awarded the Micro Lift Irrigation Project at Ramnagar by Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, the project timeline having been extended from time to time with the final completion date stated as 31.12.2024.

4. The Applicant submits that Respondent No.1 issued a Work Order dated 18.11.2022 in its favour for execution of design, engineering, supply, erection and commissioning of electrical, mechanical and substation works of the pump house along with five years’ operation and maintenance, for a total consideration of Rs.17,35,00,000/-, subject to approval of drawings and stage-wise payments, which was confirmed by email dated 19.11.2022.

5. It is stated that the Applicant furnished an Advance Bank Guarantee of Rs.1.48 Crores dated 02.03.2023, later renewed till 31.03.2025, and commenced execution of work, the scope including supply, design, transportation, erection and commissioning of the substation and allied works with mobilization advance payable against the bank guarantee and further payments linked to certified material supply at site.

6. The Applicant submits that initial drawings proposed two 16 MVA transformers, but upon review by the concerned authority (Respondent No.4), revised drawings providing 7.5 MVA transformers were submitted and ultimately approved by competent authorities through communications dated 09.02.2023 and 29.06.2023, following which the Applicant incurred expenditure of approximately Rs.2.60 Crores towards procurement.

7. It is further submitted that RA Bill No.1 dated 30.09.2023 for Rs.25,92,000/- was cleared on 22.10.2023, which according to the Applicant indicated acceptance of the approved design, and although mobilization advance was delayed till August 2023, Respondent No.1 sought consent for facilitating direct payment through letter dated 28.08.2023, and thereafter a No Objection confirmation was obtained from the Executive Engineer (E&M), Rewa, stating that drawings were in order, after which the RA Bill was cleared without dispute.

8. The Applicant states that installation activities progressed after October 2023 and an extension of time was granted from 01.01.2024 to 31.05.2024, the transformers having been offered for inspection in January 2024 and jointly inspected in February 2024 by Respondent Nos.2 to 4, who reportedly found the 7.5 MVA transformers satisfactory and best in class as per certificate dated 05.02.2024.

9. According to the Applicant, disputes thereafter arose regarding revision of price schedule and scope, and although multiple RA Bills (RA-2 to RA-11) were submitted, only partial payment of about Rs.80,00,000/- was released against the sup

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top