SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1207

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
KHETRABASI BISWAL, Judicial Member, SHISHIR AGARWAL, Technical Member
Rajeev Bhambri, Resolution Professional of Future Colonizers & Construction Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mr. Atul Kumar Kinra, Resolution Professional of Chandigarh Overseas Private Limited – Respondent
CP (IB) No. 248/Chd/Chd/2019 | I.A(IBC) No. 1148 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Applicant:Ms. Munisha Gandhi, Senior Advocate, Ms. Salina chalana, Advocate, Mr. Karanveer Jindal, Advocate
For the RP:Mr. Atul V. Sood, Advocate, Mr. Rohan Sood, Advocate
For the Homebuyers:Mr. Sarjit Bhadu, Senior Advocate, Ms. Sanya Thakur, Advocate

Joint venture investment for project development with shared profits/control does not qualify as financial debt lacking borrowing effect; participant deemed related party via joint control over net assets despite no common ownership.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Sections 5(8), 5(24)(i), 60(5) - Companies Act, 2013 - Sections 2(6), 2(27) - Joint venture arrangement for project development where land owner entrusts development to investor with shared sale proceeds 50:50, joint funding responsibility, and mutual control over sales - Investment obligation under agreement does not constitute financial debt as lacks disbursal to debtor, repayment clause, or explicit time value of money; represents joint risk-reward participation rather than borrowing - Investor qualifies as related party being joint venture with joint control and rights to net assets, irrespective of absence of common directors/shareholders - Resolution professional justified in rejecting claim as financial creditor, classifying as related party. (Paras 6(a), 6(b), 7)

(B) Related party - Scope - Joint venture under agreement reflects joint control via shared funding, sales rights at mutually agreed prices, and equal profit sharing via escrow; contractual terms establish significant influence and policy decisions akin to control, rendering party related even without equity links. (Para 6(a))

Facts of the case:
Application by resolution professional of one corporate debtor against resolution professional of another seeking acceptance of claim as unrelated financial creditor for investment under joint venture agreement for project development, challenging rejection and reclassification as related party operational claim.

Findings of Court:
Investment under joint venture not financial debt; applicant is related party; resolution professional's rejection of full claim and exclusion from committee with voting rights upheld.

Issues: (a) Whether applicant under joint venture agreement falls within related party definition under Section 5(24); (b) Whether investment constitutes financial debt under Section 5(8).

Ratio Decidendi: Joint venture clauses evidencing shared control, funding, and net assets rights classify party as related; absence of lending elements like repayment or interest precludes financial debt status, treating arrangement as partnership risk-sharing.

Result: Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. application seeks directions against rp for claim acceptance. (Para 1 , 2)
2. rp classifies jva as joint venture, not financial debt. (Para 3)
3. applicant denies related party status under jva. (Para 4)
4. jva investment not financial debt lacking borrowing effect. (Para 6)
5. rp correctly rejected claim; application dismissed. (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER

The present Application is filed on behalf of the Resolution Professional of Future Colonizers and Construction Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant) under section 60(5) and other applicable provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (hereinafter referred to as the Code) and rules and regulations made thereunder for seeking appropriate directions against the Respondent i.e Mr. Atul Kumar Kinra, the RP of Chandigarh Overseas Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent). The Applicant has sought the following reliefs:

(a) to pass an order allowing the present Application and set aside the decision of the Respondent communicated vide e-mail dated 18.10.2023 (Annexure A-2);

(b) to pass an order directing the Respondent to accept the Claim of the Applicant Company as Financial Creditor being non-related party to the Corporate Debtor;

(c) to pass an order directing the Respondent to accept the Claim of the Applicant Company as Financial Creditor being non-related party to the Corporate Debtor, to the tune of Rs.135,94,96,779;

(d) to pass an order thereby directing the inclusion of the Applicant Company as member / financial creditor in the CoC of the Respondent Company with voting rights;

(e) during the pendency of the present case, pass an ad-interim ex-parte stay on the approval of any resolution plan by the CoC of the Corporate Debtor or such approval, if any, shall be subjected to the outcome of the present case;

2. The facts of the case, as stated by the Applicant in the Application, are as under:

(a) The Chandigarh Overseas Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the CD) went into CIRP vide Order dated 27.02.2023 by this Tribunal and the Respondent Sh. Arvind Kumar was appointed as IRP and later confirmed as RP.

(b) The Applicant Company was also admitted to CIRP vide Order dated 13.10.2022 passed by this Tribunal in CP(IB) No. 49 of 2019 and Sh. Rajeev Bhambri was appointed as the IRP and later was confirmed as RP.

(c) The Applicant Company had entered into Joint Venture Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the JVA) with the CD on 08.01.2023 wherein the Applicant Company had to invest an amount of Rs. 40 crores in the construction and development of “Development Project” as stated in the the JVA. The Applicant company had the exclusive right to sell/dispose off, in any manner, 55 flats and 12 penthouses at mutually agreed price.

(d) The Applicant stated that the CD has acknowledged the investment of Rs. 19.17 crores by the applicant in terms of JVA by receipt dated 28.01.2014. No receipt dated 28.01.2014 has been attached.

(e) The Applicant stated that the investment in the CD was in the nature of the financial debt having commercial effect of borrowing and also have time value for money as the Applicant was to get exclusive right to sell/dispose off the flats, etc, he submitted a claim in Form C to the Respondent vide email dated 13.02.2023 to the tune of Rs. 135,94,96,779 as financial creditor.

(f) The Applicant submitted that after more than 7 months of submission of the claim Form, the Respondent vide its email dated 18.10.2023 had partially rejected the claim without giving the reasons and the Applicant again requested the respondent to reconsider it but no reply was received by the Applicant.

(g) The Applicant submitted that the Respondent vide its email dated 18.10.2023 has illegally reduced the claim of the Applicant from Rs. 135,94,96,779 to Rs. 19,17,00,000/-, illegally converted the Claim of the Applicant from financial debt to operational debt; and illegally declared the Applicant Company as related party to the Corporate Debtor.

(h)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top