SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1234

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Labh Singh, Judicial Member, Rekha Kantilal Shah, Technical Member
Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Pallishree Limited – Respondent
IA(I.B.C)/1305(KB)2025|IA(I.B.C)/312(KB)2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Rahul Auddy, Aditya Gooptu
For the Respondents: Urmila Chakraborty, Neelina Chatterjee, Riyanshu Agarwal

Individual consortium financial creditor can independently initiate CIRP under Section 7 IBC without others' consent; NPA classification date valid as default; recovery proceedings no bar to admission.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 7 - Application by financial creditor for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process - Credit facilities sanctioned including fund-based and non-fund based limits aggregating Rs.71.73 crores - Account classified as non-performing asset with date of default as classification date - Total default amount exceeding Rs.72 crores authenticated by information utility - Corporate debtor raised objections on consortium consent, pendency of recovery proceedings, excess security value, and non-receipt of notices - Held, individual consortium member can independently file under Section 7 without other members' consent; date of NPA classification valid as date of default; pendency of other proceedings no bar due to Section 238; debt and default proved - Application admitted, moratorium declared, interim resolution professional appointed. (Paras 23-36)

(B) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 7 - Date of default - No bar to treating date of NPA classification as date of default for Section 7 proceedings - Ordinary rule that upon NPA declaration, that date reckoned as default to enable action under Section 7. (Paras 28-31)

(C) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 238 - Overriding effect - Pendency of proceedings under recovery laws including SARFAESI Act or DRT Act no ground to reject complete Section 7 application. (Paras 32-33)

Facts of the case:
Financial creditor provided credit facilities to corporate debtor renewed at Rs.71.73 crores on 29.05.2021, secured by hypothecation and guarantees. Debtor defaulted, account classified as NPA on 18.06.2023 with outstanding Rs.72.40 crores. Demand notices issued, record filed with information utility. Debtor contested maintainability citing consortium requirements, parallel DRT proceedings, excess security, and solvency.

Findings of Court:
Debt and default established exceeding threshold; application complete; no pre-existing dispute; CIRP initiated against corporate debtor; moratorium imposed; specified professional appointed as interim resolution professional with directions for public announcement and expense deposit.

Issues: (i) Whether financial creditor requires consortium consent to file; (ii) Whether debt and default exist; (iii) Whether recovery proceedings bar Section 7; (iv) Entitlement to relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Individual financial creditor in consortium can initiate independently; NPA date constitutes valid default supported by information utility record; IBC overrides inconsistent recovery proceedings; no admission defects where debt/default proved.

Result: Section 7 application admitted.

Table of Content
1. section 7 application filing details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. credit facilities, default, and notices. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. irp appointment compliance. (Para 10)
4. corporate debtor's defenses and objections. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. financial creditor's rejoinder. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
6. issues for determination. (Para 21 , 22)
7. independent consortium filing allowed. (Para 23 , 24)
8. debt and default proven. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 31)
9. npa date as default valid. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
10. drt proceedings no bar. (Para 32 , 33)
11. application complete, default exists. (Para 34 , 35)
12. admission, irp, moratorium ordered. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)

O R D E R

Labh Singh, Member (Judicial)

1. The Bank of India, the Financial Creditor has filed the instant application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter to be referred as “the IBC Code”) read with rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 (for brevity ‘the Rules’) with a prayer to trigger Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in respect of respondent Company, Pallishree Limited Holding (hereinafter referred as “Corporate Debtor”).

2. It is appropriate to mention that the applicant Bank is a Financial Creditor constituted under the Banking Companies(Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970 having its head office at Star House 15.09.2024, C-5, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex,, Bandra East, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400051 and carrying on its Banking business inter-alia from its Kolkata Asset Recovery Branch at Star House, 5 BTM SARANI, Kolkata-700001. The present application has been filed through Sh. Sanjeev Shivdas Bagul, Assistant General Manager forinitiation of insolvency resolution process against the respondent under the IBC Code. A copy of Board Resolution dated 18.07.2019 with Letter Annexture “A” has been placed on record.

3. The Corporate Debtor against whom initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process has been prayed for, was incorporated on 09.04.1948 having its registered office situated at Holding No. 408, O.B Road, Ward No. 6, Pallishree, Arambagh Hooghly-712601. Since the registered office of the respondent Corporate Debtor is situated at Hooghly, this Tribunal having territorial jurisdiction over the State of West Bengal is the Adjudicating Authority in relation to the prayer for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process(CIRP) in respect of respondent Corporate Debtor under sub-section (1) of Section 60 of the Code.

4. Briefly stated the facts of the case are thatthe Corporate Debtor availed credit facilities from the Financial Creditor, and on 29.05.2021, the Financial Creditor issued a sanction letter for the revised credit facilities. In terms of the said revised sanction letter, the existing term loan of Rs. 0.81 crores was extinguished; the Fund based working capital was renewed at a limit of Rs. 71.33 crores and the non fund based limits were renewed at Rs.0.40 crores, and thus an aggregate sum of Rs. 71.73 crores was granted to the Corporate Debtor.

5. Pursuant to such revised credit facilities being sanctioned and since credit facilities were sanctioned by Punjab National Bankand also, there was a consortium of landers, the Corporate Debtor executed several loan and security documentson 28.01.2022 which includes a Working capital consortium agreement, an Interse Agreement between the Bankers, and a Deed of Hypothecation. Additionally, a Personal Guarantee of Baibhav Kumar Roy dated 28.01.2022, affidavit of Director, Memorandum of Entry and a Letter of Undertaking were executed to secure the credit facilities.

6. Thereafter, the Corporate Debtor started defaulting in the repayment of the credit facilities and accordingly, the Financial Creditor classified the account of the Corporate Debtor as Non-Performing Assets (NPA) on 18.06.2023. The date of default is 18.06.2023. The total amount of debt is Rs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top