SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1292

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Praveen Gupta, Member (Judicial), Ashish Verma, Member (Technical)
Vipin Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Alok Kumar Kuchhal – Respondent
Appeal No.02/2024 | CP (IB) No.45/ALD/2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: NONE
For the Respondents: Sh. Yash Tandon, Adv., Sh. Alok Kumar Kuchhal

Belated claims by genuine allottees in liquidation condonable despite 847-day delay if payments reflected in debtor records and no prejudice, payable from unclaimed liquidation funds held by IBBI.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Sections 5(8)(f), 42 - IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 - Regulation 12 - Liquidation process - Belated claim by allottees claiming status as financial creditors - Delay of 847 days in filing claim after liquidation commencement - Payments reflected in corporate debtor’s audited financial statements and supported by allotment letter - Public announcements made during CIRP (last date 01.05.2019) and liquidation (last date 02.03.2022) ignored by claimants - No claim filed in either phase - General email for document verification of existing claimants in 2024 not invitation for new claims - Held: Despite inordinate delay, bona fide explanation of absence abroad for professional reasons accepted; claim condoned where payments verifiable from records, no prejudice caused as undistributed funds available in liquidation account with IBBI; procedural timelines directory, cannot override substantial rights of genuine allottees whose payments reflected in records - Directions issued to admit claim and release amount from unclaimed liquidation proceeds. (Paras 11-18)

(B) Liquidation process - Condonation of delay - Judicial precedents on homebuyers’ claims - Timelines under liquidation regulations not punitive where no distribution prejudice; RP/Liquidator bound to consider claims reflected in debtor records even if belatedly filed; unclaimed funds suffice without impacting stakeholders. (Paras 15-16)

Facts of the case:
Appellants, joint allottees of a residential unit, paid principal amount in 2016, issued allotment letter, amount reflected in corporate debtor’s audited statements. Unaware of CIRP (commenced 16.04.2019) or liquidation (01.02.2022), failed to file claims by respective deadlines. Surfaced in 2024 post general verification email, claim rejected as belated. Sought condonation, claim admission, stay on distribution.

Findings of Court:
Delay condoned; claim admitted as genuine financial creditor; payment directed from undistributed/unclaimed proceeds in liquidation account held by IBBI.

Issues: Whether inordinate delay of 847 days in liquidation claim filing bars admission despite verifiable payments in debtor records; whether liquidator must accept claims of genuine allottees reflected in financial statements post-deadline.

Ratio Decidendi: Belated claims by genuine homebuyers/allottees, verifiable from corporate debtor’s records, entitle condonation of delay in liquidation if no prejudice to distribution; substantial rights prevail over directory procedural timelines; unclaimed funds available for such payments without affecting stakeholders.

Result: Appeal allowed.

Table of Content
1. appellants' delayed claim submission due to absence and lack of notice (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. appellants argue for condonation citing precedents and payments in records (Para 7 , 8)
3. liquidator opposes due to advanced distribution and unexplained delay (Para 9)
4. court notes timelines, no prior claims, and email was for verification only (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. nclat precedents mandate considering homebuyers' claims in cd records (Para 15)
6. delay condoned; claims admitted payable from unclaimed liquidation funds (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

ORDER

1. This appeal bearing Appeal No. 02/2024 in CP(IB) 45/ALD/2019 has been filed on 28.08.2024 by the Appellants, who claim to be Financial Creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, (hereinafter referred to as “IBC, 2016/the Code”) under section 42 of the Code, read with Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 seeking appropriate directions against Mr. Alok Kumar Kuchhal, Liquidator (hereinafter referred to as the “Respondent”) of Ratandeep Infrastructure Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the “Corporate Debtor”) praying for the following reliefs:

a. To direct the Learned Liquidator to consider the claim of the Financial Creditor/ Appellant and accept the same;

b. To condone the delay of 847 days in filing claim with the liquidator;

c. To stay the process of distribution of funds in the liquidation process of the Corporate Debtor.

d. To pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

2. It is submitted that the Appellants jointly purchased Unit No. 203, Silver Homes, GH-02, Jaipuria Township, Opposite Columbia Asia Hospital, Ghaziabad-201002, for which an Allotment Letter dated 09.08.2016 was issued by the Corporate Debtor. The unit was purchased for a total consideration of Rs. 25,87,000/-, out of which the Appellants paid Rs. 8,20,000/- in four tranches and receipts were issued by the Corporate Debtor. According to the Appellants, the total claim amount is Rs. 13,12,000/-, comprising Rs. 8,20,000/- as the principal amount paid in 2016 and Rs. 4,92,000/- as interest @12% per annum.

3. It is submitted that the Audited Financial Statements for the financial year 31.03.2018 of the Corporate Debtor also shows the amount of Rs.5,93,579/- (Rupees Five Lakh, Ninety-Three Thousand, Five Hundred and Seventy-Nine Only) deposited by the Appellant No.1 with the Corporate Debtor.

4. The Appellants submit that since payments were made through the banking channel and reflected in the accounts of the Corporate Debtor, they were under the bona fide impression that their liability was duly accounted for and that they would receive the benefit of their payments. It is stated that only upon receiving an email dated 07.06.2024 from the Respondent requesting verification of documents for the purpose of distribution, the Appellants submitted the requisite documents on 29.06.2024. Despite submission of documents and subsequent reminders, including email dated 20.08.2024, no communication regarding acceptance or rejection of the claim was received.

5. The Appellants state that after not receiving any response, they personally visited the office of the Respondent on 24.08.2024 to inquire about their claim, whereafter the Respondent, vide email dated 26.08.2024, rejected their claim on the ground that it was filed belatedly relying on Regulation 12 of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, wherein the last date of submission of claims after the liquidation order dated 01.02.2022 was 02.03.2022. The relevant excerpts from the email dated 26.08.2024 by the Liquidator are as follows:

“Dear Sir, This is in reference to the process of distribution of funds in the liquidation process of Ratandeep Infrastructure Private Limited, wherein you've visited the office of Liquidator on 24.08.2024 and an email was also sent to you from the office of Liquidator on 07.06.2024.

Please note that office o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top