SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1310

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Sanjiv Jain, Judicial Member, Venkataraman Subramanium, Technical Member
SVL Limited – Appellant
Versus
Abhiyantha Project Engineering Private Limited – Respondent
CP(IBC)/94(CHE)/2025|CP IB 94 CHE 2025|CP (IB)/94(CHE)/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Madhumitha, Raj Jabakh
For the Respondents: Ms. Sangamithra Loganathan, Shri.V.Manivannan, Arvind Rajagopal

Under Section 7 IBC, upon proof of financial debt exceeding Rs.1 Crore threshold and default, even if admitted by corporate debtor, petition must be admitted, CIRP initiated, moratorium declared, and IRP appointed.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 7 - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Financial creditor filed petition alleging default on loan repayment - Corporate debtor admitted debt and default - Tribunal satisfied existence of financial debt exceeding threshold of Rs.1 Crore and default - Petition admitted, CIRP initiated, moratorium declared, IRP appointed. (Paras 1-9, 17-23)

(B) IBC, 2016 - Sections 4, 14, 17 - Threshold limit - Default amount of Rs.13,46,55,499/- met minimum requirement - Moratorium prohibits institution/continuation of suits, transfer of assets, recovery actions - Management vests in IRP, board powers suspended. (Paras 22, 25-26)

(C) Related party status - Queries on substantial investments via loan and debentures - Both parties confirmed no related party relationship under applicable definitions - Even if related, does not bar filing petition, only CoC membership. (Paras 19-20)

Facts of the case:
Financial creditor advanced unsecured loan under demand repayable agreement, reflected in audited financials. Corporate debtor acknowledged outstanding dues multiple times, failed to repay despite demand notice dated 20.01.2025, default recorded on 27.01.2025. Corporate debtor admitted liability and default due to financial distress post-pandemic, supported by documents including NeSL record of default.

Findings of Court:
Petition complete under Section 7(5); financial debt and default established by documentary evidence and admission; clarifications on investments, repayments, sources confirmed legitimacy; CIRP initiated against corporate debtor; moratorium imposed; specified professional appointed as IRP.

Issues: Existence of financial debt and default; related party classification despite investments; source and proof of repayments; impact of prior acknowledgements and demand notice.

Ratio Decidendi: Adjudicating Authority must verify debt due and default occurred as per Innoventive Industries (Supra); once established with threshold met and within limitation, petition mandatorily admitted; related party status irrelevant for admission, admission follows upon proof. (Paras 21-22)

Result: Petition admitted.

Table of Content
1. petition filed under section 7 for cirp initiation (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. petitioner establishes financial debt and default (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. corporate debtor admits debt and default due to distress (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. tribunal verifies debt, default, and clarifications (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. debt and default established; petition admitted (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
6. irp appointed; moratorium declared; cirp initiated (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)

O R D E R

(Heard Through Hybrid Mode)

1. This petition CP IB 94 CHE 2025 has been filed by SVL Limited as financial creditor on 22.04.2025 under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code”) read with Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “the AAA Rules”) for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (hereinafter referred to as “CIRP”) against Abhiyantha Project Engineering Private Limited the Corporate Debtor (CD).

2. Petitioner is a public limited company in Chennai. Corporate Debtor is a limited company having registered office at Chennai and was incorporated on 20.04.2004 with CIN No U51229TN2004PLC053001. It is stated Corporate Debtor approached the petitioner to avail loan for its business expansion plans. It is stated that the loan was for a short period and repayable on demand. The loan is also reflected in the books of accounts of the Corporate Debtor. Further, it is stated that Corporate Debtor acknowledged the debt on 17.08.2022, 14.07.2023 and 16.08.2024. It is stated that as per latest confirmation of balance , the loan amount due and outstanding is reflected to be Rs. 13,46,55,499.

3. It is stated that petitioner issued a demand notice on 20.01.2025 seeking that outstanding dues are paid within seven days from receipt of the notice but Corporate Debtor did not pay. Consequently the debt of Rs.13,46,55,499/- was defaulted by Corporate Debtor and date of default is 27.01.2025.

4. In Part III of the petition, petitioner recommended the name of Mr. Amier Hamsa Ali Abbas Rawther ( IBBI/IPA-01/IP-P01727/2019- 2020/12620), R094, SBIOA Unity Enclave,Mambakkam Post, Near Shiva temple, Chennai -600127 . Written consent from proposed IRA was also obtained.

5. As per Part IV of the petition, the date of default is 27.01.2025 and the amount in default is Rs. 13,46,55.459/- ( Rs. Thirteen crore forty six lakhs fifty five thousand and four hundred and fifty nine only). Following documents are enclosed with petition to support debt and default claim:

a. Copy of demand notice sent by the Financial Creditor to the Corporate Debtor dated 20.01.2025.

b. Copy of the Audited Financials of the Financial Creditor for the last 3 years. [Annexure L]

c. Copy of the Master Data of the Financial Creditor as taken from MCA website.

d. Copy of the Master Data taken from the MCA website, of the Corporate Debtor.

e. Copy of the Record of Default issued by the National E-Governance Services Limited in Form C.

f. Copy of the Audited Financials of the Corporate Debtor for the last 3 financial years.

Submissions by Petitioner:

6. It is stated that Petitioner SVL Limited is a Public Limited Company. was desirous of expanding its business and hence approached Petitioner to avail a loan for the said purpose. It is stated that the petitioner advanced a loan which is reflected in the Audited Balance Sheet of the Respondent. The said loan was to be repaid within a short period, or upon the demand of Petitioner, by Respondent.

7. It is stated that loan to be repaid was periodically acknowledged by the Respondent inter-alia on 17.08.2022, 14.07.2023 and 16.08.2024. Even as per the latest confirmation sent by the Respondent, the loan amount due and outstanding to be paid to the Petitioner is reflected to be a sum of Rs. 13,46,55,499/-. It is stated that despite several oral requests made for repayment of amounts advanced, no payments were forthcoming fr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top