SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2343

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Labh Singh, Member, Rekha Kantilal Shah, Member
Pawan Singhal – Appellant
Versus
GIR Logistics Private Limited – Respondent
I.A. 11 (KB) of 2025|I.A. 12 (KB) of 2025|C.P. 198 (KB) of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ashwani Kumar Dhatwalia, Debmalya Ganguli, Soumalya Ganguli
For the Respondents: Rakhi Shroff

The Registrar of Companies is considered a necessary and proper party in proceedings where the Tribunal’s adjudication directly impacts the maintenance of statutory records and requires the performance of statutory duties by said authority, as per the principles of Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 2013 - Sections 168, 169, 241, 242, 244 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order I Rule 10(2) - Impleadment of Necessary Party - Tribunal’s power to direct statutory authorities - Removal of Director - Form DIR-12 - The Court held that the Registrar of Companies is a necessary party when the relief sought directly involves updating statutory records and the functioning of the Registrar. Principles of Order I Rule 10(2) of the CPC apply to ensure complete and effective adjudication and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. The application for impleadment was allowed to facilitate the adjudication of the dispute regarding the removal of a director from company records. (Paras 7.4, 7.5, 7.6)

Facts of the case:
A petition was filed challenging the removal of the Petitioner from the Board of Directors of the company. Following the passing of a resolution for his removal, the company sought to update its records with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) by filing Form DIR-12. The ROC failed to act, prompting the company to file interlocutory applications for impleading the ROC and seeking directions for the update of company records.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found that the ROC is a necessary and proper party as the relief claimed directly impacts its statutory duties. The Tribunal allowed the application to implead the ROC as a respondent to ensure that effectual relief could be granted and to resolve the dispute regarding the maintenance of statutory records.

Issues: Whether the Registrar of Companies is a necessary party to the proceedings seeking directions for updating company records pursuant to a board resolution.

Ratio Decidendi: Under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, a party whose presence is essential to grant effectual relief and avoid multiplicity of litigation must be impleaded. Given the nature of the relief sought against the Registrar of Companies, their impleadment is necessary for the effective adjudication of the petition.

Result: I.A. 12 (KB) of 2025 allowed.

Table of Content
1. overview of interlocutory applications seeking impleadment and updates to statutory records following director removal disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. detailed facts regarding the roc's failure to update form dir-12 and the opposing party's contentions regarding maintainability. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. legal necessity of impleading a statutory authority under order i rule 10(2) cpc for effectual relief. (Para 7)

I.A. 11 (KB) of 2025 & I.A. 12 (KB) of 2025

An application under The Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016;

Coram:

Shri Labh Singh : Member (Judicial)

Ms. Rekha Kantilal Shah : Member (Technical)

Appearances (via hybrid mode)-:

For the Petitioner

i. Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dhatwalia, Adv.

ii. Mr. Debmalya Ganguli, Adv.

iii. Mr. Soumalya Ganguli, Adv.

For the Respondents

i. Ms. Rakhi Shroff, Adv.

Date of Pronouncement-: 21.04.2026

ORDER

Per: Rekha Kantilal Shah, Member (Technical)

1. I.A. 12 (KB) of 2025

1.1 The instant application has been preferred, praying for the following reliefs:-

a. To implead the Registrar of Companies, Kolkata as a party to the present petition;

AND/OR

b. To pass such further order(s) or direction(s) as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

2. I.A. 11 (KB) of 2025

2.1 The instant application has been preferred, praying for the following reliefs:-

a. To direct the Registrar of Companies, Kolkata, to take on record Form DIR-12 and remove the name of Petitioner, Mr. Pawan Singhal from the ROC’s website;

b. Such further orders or directions be passed as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper.

3. Background of the Case

3.1 The brief facts, as borne out from the record, are that the Petitioner had filed Company Petition No. 198 of 2023 under Sections 241, 242 and 244 of the Companies Act, 2013, inter alia challenging the affairs of the Company and seeking, as part of interim reliefs, a stay on the operation of Special Notice dated 30.06.2023 proposing his removal from the Board of Directors.

3.2 This Tribunal, after hearing the parties, vide order dated1Marked as Annexure A of I.A. 12/KB/2025 26.07.2023, declined to grant any interim relief restraining the holding of the Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) and permitted the Company to proceed with the meeting as scheduled.

3.3 In compliance with the aforesaid order, the EGM was convened and held on 28.07.2023, wherein the shareholders of Respondent No.1 Company passed a resolution2Resolution passed at the EGM has been annexed as Annexure – B of I.A. 12/KB/2025 removing Mr. Pawan Singhal from the Board of Directors.

4. Fact in a nutshell of I.A. 12 (KB) of 2025-:

4.1 The Applicant has filed the present Interlocutory Application seeking impleadment of the Registrar of Companies, Kolkata as a necessary party in the Company Petition pending adjudication before this Tribunal.

4.2 It is submitted that the Respondent had earlier preferred an application before this Tribunal seeking directions to the Registrar of Companies, Kolkata to take on record Form DIR-12 and to remove the name of Mr. Pawan Singhal from the records maintained on the ROC portal. The said request emanates from the resolution dated 03.07.2023, which was subsequently approved in the Extraordinary General Meeting held on 28.07.2023, whereby the Petitioner was removed from the Board of Directors of Respondent No. 1 Company.

4.3 The Applicant submits that despite the aforesaid resolution having been validly passed, the Registrar of Companies, Kolkata has failed to discharge its statutory obligations by not taking Form DIR-12 on record and by not updating the records to reflect the removal of the Petitioner from the Board of Directors. Hence, the Registrar of Companies is a necessary and proper party to the present proceedings.

4.4 The brief facts leading to the present application are as follows:

a. The Petitioner had filed Company Petition No. 198 of 2023 under Sections 241, 242

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top