SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2406

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH - I
Prabhat Kumar, Technical Member, Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey, Judicial Member
THE CANARA BANK LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DR PADMANABHAN SHEKHAR – Respondent
C.P. (IB) NO. 1413/MB/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ojas Gole
For the Respondents:

Insolvency proceedings initiated under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against a Personal Guarantor abate upon the death of the guarantor, as the process is for insolvency resolution rather than debt recovery.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code - Personal Guarantors - Death of Personal Guarantor - Proceedings under Section 95 are intended for initiating an insolvency resolution process and not for the recovery of debt; consequently, such proceedings abate upon the death of the individual guarantor. (Para 10)

Issues: Whether insolvency proceedings under Section 95 of the IBC can continue against a deceased Personal Guarantor.

Table of Content
1. initiation of insolvency process against a personal guarantor for outstanding debt. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. discovery of the personal guarantor's death prior to the filing of the insolvency application. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. abatement of insolvency proceedings under section 95 upon the death of the personal guarantor. (Para 10 , 11)
ORDER

Brief facts:

1. The present petition is filed u/s. 95 (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “IBC/Code") r/w Rule 7(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019 by The Canara Bank, (“hereinafter referred to as Petitioner/Financial Creditor”) for initiating insolvency process against Dr. Padmanabhan Shekar (“hereinafter referred to as Personal Guarantor/Respondent”) for outstanding debt of Rs. 2,63,16,55,309/- (Rupees Two Hundred and Sixty-Three Crore Sixteen Lakhs Fifty- Five Thousand Three Hundred and Nine Only) with further interest and charges payable. The Date of Default as specified in Part-III of the present petition is 30.11.2012.

2. The Petitioner is an Indian Public Sector Bank having its Head Office at 112, J.C. Road, Bengaluru – 560001, and inter alia, a branch office at SAM Branch, Canara Bank Building, 8th Floor, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai – 400051.

3. The Personal Guarantor, viz. Dr. Padmanabhan Shekhar having his address at Sai Vihar CHS Ltd., Plot No. 434-435, Sector- 1, Ghansoli, Navi Mumbai – 400701 and stood as the Guarantor for M/S. Micro Secure Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Corporate Debtor/ Principal Borrower”) to secure the credit facilities extended to the Corporate Debtor.

4. The Corporate Debtor was incorporated on 27.03.2007 bearing CIN U72300MH2007PLC169254 and has its registered address at D-4, First Floor, Udyog Sadan No 3 Seepz, MIDC Andheri (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India - 400093.

5. This Tribunal appointed Mr. Nitin om Kothari, having Insolvency Registration No. IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P-02310/2020-2021/13477, to act as the Resolution Professional in the present matter vide order dated 05.01.2026 and directed him to file report under section 99 of the Code within 10 days. Accordingly, the RP has filed IA (I.B.C)/1139/MB/2026 thereby placing his report on record on 20.03.2026 recommending rejection of the present petition.

6. In compliance with Section 99 (2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Resolution Professional issued letters dated 13.01.2026 and 30.01.2026 to the Personal Guarantor at his known addresses. Additionally, an email communication dated 30.01.2026 was also issued, seeking requisite information and documents for the purpose of preparation of the Report under Section 99 of the Code. It is further submitted that initially no response was received from the Personal Guarantor.

7. However, The Resolution Professional received the reply dated 30.01.2026 from Mr. Aditya Sekhar, son and legal heir of the Personal Guarantor, along with a Death Certificate evidencing that Dr. Padmanabhan Shekhar (Personal Guarantor) had expired on 29.01.2022, i.e., prior to the filing of the present Application under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on 25.09.2025.

8. The legal heir of personal guarantor has further attached the authentic copy of the Order dated 12.03.2014 passed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Company Petition No. 602 of 2013, whereby the Official Liquidator was appointed in respect of the Corporate Debtor and its subsidiaries, and has also stated that the personal assets of the guarantors had been attached and sold in prior proceedings.

9. Pursuant to the Report of the Resolution Professional, the reply filed by the son/legal heir of the Personal Guarantor, and the Death Certificate placed on record, it is observed that the Personal Guarantor had expired on 29.01.2022, i.e., prior to the filing of the present applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top