SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2411

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Mr Vinod Surana – Appellant
Versus
Registrar of Companie Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:PARESH DEVIDAS DESHPANDE

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH COURT – IV Item No.: 18 IA(COMPANIES.ACT)/61(MB)2026 IN CP/62(MB)2021 CORAM:

SHRI ANIL RAJ CHELLAN SHRI K. R. SAJI KUMAR HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL) HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING (HYBRID) HELD ON 26.03.2026 N AME OF THE PARTIES: MR. VINOD SURANA VS REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES MUMBAI For Applicant : Adv. Omkar V Deosthale a/w CS Paresh Deshpande.

Section 252 (1) of the Companies Act r/w Rule 11 of NCLT Rules

O R D E R

IA(COMPANIES.ACT)/61(MB)2026

1. This Application has been filed under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016, seeking condonation of delay of 61 days in paying the cost imposed vide order dated

23.06.2023.

2. The Applicant had filed the Company Petition for restoring the name of Ganpatj Constro Projects LLP (hereinafter ‘LLP’). The Company Petition for restoration of the name of the LLP was allowed by this Tribunal vide order dated 23.06.2023, subject, inter alia, to payment of a sum of Rs. 20,000/- for each financial year during which the LLP has defaulted in filing the statutory returns, to be paid within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order. It is submitted that there were disputes among the partners regarding t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top