SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2453

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (DIVISION BENCH –II) KOLKATA
Labh Singh, Judicial Member, Rekha Kantilal Shah, Technical Member
MANPURIA REALATORS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES KOLKATA – Respondent
C.P. No. 150/KB/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shruti Singhania, FCS
For the Respondents: Jithin Krishnan, AROC

The NCLT may restore a company's name struck off under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013, provided the company complies with statutory filings and pays the prescribed costs.

Headnote:(A) Restoration of Company - Struck off name - Non-filing of financial statements and annual returns - Restoration allowed upon payment of costs and filing of pending statutory documents. (Para 5)

Issues: Whether the name of the company struck off due to non-filing of statutory returns should be restored.

Table of Content
1. application for restoration of a company struck off for non-compliance with statutory filings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. restoration of company name subject to filing of pending documents and payment of costs. (Para 5)
3. formal disposal and administrative directions of the petition. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

O R D E R

Per: Labh Singh, Member (Judicial)

1) This Company Petition has been filed by one of the shareholders of the Company u/s 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of name of the struck off company in the Register of Companies, maintained in the office of the Registrar of Companies, Kolkata. It is stated that the name of the Company was struck off on 29/06/2018.

2) It is contended that the Company has not filed the Financial Statements and Annual Returns from the financial year ended 2015-2016 to 2024-2025, due to non-filing of Financial Statements and Annual Returns with the RoC, the Company name got struck off from the Registrar of Companies. It is further submitted that delay in filing the Balance Sheets and Annual Returns were unintentional.

3) Upon the said contentions, the Ld. Counsel for the Petitioners prayed for passing an order for restoration of the name of the Petitioner Company.

4) Notices were issued to the Registrar of Companies, West Bengal. The Registrar of Companies, West Bengal has submitted its report at the Registry with copy to the petitioner. It was stated in the report that only after compliance of the requirements to be met under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013, Registrar of Companies, West Bengal has struck off the name of the petitioner company from the register maintained by the Registrar of Companies, West Bengal .

5) Upon perusal of the application, we are satisfied that the name of the company should be restored to the register. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed on the following terms:-

a) The Registrar of Companies, Kolkata, West Bengal, the Respondent herein, is directed to restore the original status of the Company as if the name of the Company had not been struck off from the register of companies with the resultant and consequential actions like changing status of the Company from ‘Struck Off’ to ‘Active’.

b) The Petitioner Company is directed to file all the pending statutory document(s) including Annual Accounts and Annual Returns along with prescribed fees/additional fee/fine as decided by the Registrar of Companies, Kolkata within 45 days from the date on which its name is restored on the register of companies maintained by the Registrar of Companies, Kolkata.

c) The restoration of the Company’s name is also subject to the payment of cost of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakhs only) for the Financial years 2015-2016 to 2024-2025 through online payment in www.mca.gov.in under Miscellaneous Fee by mentioning particulars as “Payment of cost for restoration of company pursuant to orders of NCLT in C.P. No. 67/KB/2024”.

d) The Petitioner is directed to deliver a certified copy of this order with the Registrar of Companies, Kolkata within thirty days of the receipt of this order.

e) This order is confined to the violations, which ultimately led to the impugned action of striking off the name of the Company, and it will not come in the way of Registrar of Companies, Kolkata to take appropriate action(s) in accordance with law, for any other violations / offences, if any, committed by the Company prior to or during the period the name of the Company remained struck off.

6) The C.P. No. 150 /KB/2025 is disposed of accordingly.

7) The Registry is directed to send e-mail copies of the order forthwith to all the parties inclusive of the Counsel.

8) Urgent certified copy of this order, if applied for be issued upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top