SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2850

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Lakshmi Gurung, Judicial Member, Hariharan Neelakanta Iyer, Technical Member
Clariant Services India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Italtinto Equipment Private Limited – Respondent
I.A. 2670/2024 In C.P.(IB) 625(MB)/2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vinay Kate, Gunjan Chaubey
For the Respondents: Bhaskar Gopal Shetty

Claims against a corporate debtor in liquidation, particularly assessments under the EPF & MP Act made after the liquidation commencement date, are inadmissible as they fail to satisfy the requirement of Regulation 16(2) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, which mandates that debts must exist on the commencement date.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 60(5) - Liquidation - Provident Fund dues - Claim filed based on assessment orders passed after liquidation commencement date - Whether admissible - Regulation 16(2) of IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 mandates that claims provable must exist as on the liquidation commencement date - Orders passed by the applicant under sections 7Q and 14B of the EPF & MP Act, 1952, subsequent to the liquidation order, do not constitute claims existing at the time of liquidation commencement.

Facts of the case:
The Applicant (EPFO) sought admission of a claim for provident fund dues, including interest and damages under sections 7Q and 14B of the EPF & MP Act, 1952, amounting to Rs. 8,09,617/-. These assessments were finalized in 2023, well after the Corporate Debtor entered liquidation on 08.06.2022. The Liquidator rejected the claim on the grounds that it was not in existence on the date of liquidation.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal held that claims arising from assessments conducted after the liquidation commencement date cannot be entertained by the Liquidator. The statutory scheme, specifically Regulation 16(2) of the Liquidation Regulations, limits claims to those in existence on the liquidation commencement date. The Tribunal observed that the PF department failed to pursue these dues diligently, starting only after the company had already proceeded into liquidation.

Issues: Whether an order passed by the EPFO after the liquidation commencement date creates a valid claim admissible in the liquidation process, and whether the claim should be kept outside the Liquidation Estate.

Ratio Decidendi: Pursuant to Regulation 16(2) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, the Liquidator can only admit claims that were in existence on the liquidation commencement date. Subsequent assessment orders cannot retroactively create debts entitled to priority if they did not exist at the onset of liquidation.

Result: Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. procedural timeline of liquidation and claim submission by epfo. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. parties' contentions regarding priority of provident fund dues and asset availability. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
3. admissibility of claims based on assessments made after liquidation commencement status. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

__________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

I.A. 2670/2024 [Sec. 60(5)]

1. Heard Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and Ld. Liquidator. Perused the record.

2. The present Application has been filed by Central Board of Trustees, EPF (‘Applicant’) under section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (‘the Code’) seeking following reliefs: -

a. To pass an order and direct the liquidator to admit and pay the claim of Rs. 8,09,617/- towards provident fund dues under sections 7Q, 14B and Short Remittance of EPF & MP Act, 1952.

b. Any other order that this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of this case.

Relevant facts to be noticed

3. Upon an application filed by an Operational Creditor under Section 9 of the Code, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (in short ‘CIRP’) of M/s. Italtinto Equipment Private Limited (“hereinafter referred to as ‘Corporate Debtor’) commenced on 09.02.2021 and Mr. Bhaskar Gopal Shetty (Respondent) was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (in short ‘IRP’). Public announcement was made on 20.02.2021 inviting claim from stakeholders to be filed on or before 05.03.2021. Based on the claims, CoC was constituted. The respondent was confirmed by the CoC to be appointed as RP.

4. As no resolution plan was received, upon an application under Section 33(1) of the Code, this Tribunal ordered for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor on 08.06.2022 in IA/2200/2021 and the Respondent was appointed as the Liquidator.

5. The Applicant, being the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner – II (Legal), Regional Office Thane (North), received email dated 18.07.2022 from the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (in short ‘EPFO’) about the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.

6. On 06.02.2023, the Applicant addressed an email to the Liquidator providing an e-notice for inquiry under section 7Q and 14B of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (in short ‘EPF & MP Act’). The Liquidator replied vide email dated 10.02.2023 and requested the Applicant to close the matter since the company had no assets and the filing of any claim would also be barred by limitation.

7. The Applicant filed its claim of Rs. 8,09,617 before the liquidator on 17.08.2023 and also sought to keep the Provident Fund (in short ‘PF’) and allied dues out of the Liquidation Estate.

8. The Applicant filed the present application on 08.05.2024 seeking admission of its claim and payment of the dues.

9. Submissions of the Applicant

9.1 It is submitted that the Applicant received the intimation vide email dated 18.07.2022 regarding liquidation of the Corporate Debtor and only after receipt of the said email the Appellant was in position to know that the Corporate Debtor is undergoing CIRP proceedings. Accordingly, verification was initiated with respect to position of short remittance, PF dues with regards to non-remittance of monthly PF contributions under Section 7A , interest and penalty i.e. damages under Section 7Q and 14B of the EPF & MP Act.

9.2 It is submitted that upon verification, it was identified that there is short remittance i.e. default in PF dues for amount of Rs. 7,50,081. Further, the Corporate Debtor also defaulted in remittance of PF contribution within the time prescribed under the EPF & MP Act read with EPF Scheme 1952. For the said belayed payment, the provisions of section 7Q (i.e. interest) and Section 14B (i.e. penalty in form of damages) of the EPF & MP Act were invoked and summons to the corporate debtor were issued for the period starting from 11/2016 to 11/2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top