IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD BENCH – II
VC AND PHYSICAL (HYBRID) MODE
IA (IBC)/1412/2023, IA (IBC)/804/2023, IA (IBC)/343/2025 in CP (IB) No. 402/7/HDB/2020
Export-Import Bank of India vs. DQ Entertainment (International) Ltd
SHRI. RAJEEV BHARDWAJ, HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL); SHRI. SANJAY PURI, HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
30.04.2026
Vamsi
S.No.1
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
HYDERABAD BENCH – II
VC AND PHYSICAL (HYBRID) MODE
ATTENDANCE CUM ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING HELD ON
30.04.2026 AT 10:30 A.M.
IA (IBC)/1412/2023, IA (IBC)/804/2023, IA (IBC)/343/2025 in
CP (IB) No. 402/7/HDB/2020
U/s 7 of IBC
IN THE MATTER OF:
Export-Import Bank of India …Petitioner
AND
DQ Entertainment (International) Ltd …Respondent
C O R A M:-
SHRI. RAJEEV BHARDWAJ, HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
SHRI. SANJAY PURI, HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
O R D E R
IA (IBC)/1412/2023
Orders pronounced, recorded vide separate sheets. In the result, the
IA (IBC)/1412/2023 is dismissed.
IA (IBC)/804/2023
Orders pronounced, recorded vide separate sheets. In the result, the
IA (IBC)/804/2023 is dismissed.
IA (IBC)/343/2025
Orders pronounced, recorded vide separate sheets. In the result, the
IA (IBC)/343/2025 is dismissed.
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
HYDERABAD BENCH, COURT-II
I.A (IBC) No. 1412 of 2023
in
C.P (IB) No. 402/7/HDB/2020
[Under Section 17(2)(d), 19(2) and 60(5) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Code, 2016]
IN THE MATTER OF EXPORT IMPORT BANK OF INDIA vs. DQ
ENTERTAINMENT (INTERNATIONAL) LIMITED
Between:
Mr. Venka Reddy Bathina
Liquidator, DQ Entertainement
(International) Limited, Aurora Colony,
Road No. 3, Banjara Hills,
Hyderabad-500034.
…....Applicant
AND
1. Metropolitan Commissioner,
Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority,
Swarna Jayanti Complex, Sanjeeva Reddy Colony,
Srinivasa Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad-500038.
…...Respondent No. 1
2. Principal Secretary, Information Technology,
Electronics & Communications Department,
3rd Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad,
Telangana-500022.
…...Respondent No. 2
3. Principal Secretary, Municipal Administrations
And Urban Development Department, Telangana
Secretariat, Commissioner and Director of Municipal
Administration, 640, AC Guards, Masab Tank, Opp.
PTI Building, Hyderabad-500004.
…...Respondent No. 3
Date of Order: 30.04.2026
Coram:
Hon’ble Shri Rajeev Bhardwaj, Member (Judicial)
Hon’ble Shri Sanjay Puri, Member (Technical)
Counsels Present
For Applicant : M. Maharshi Viswaraj, Ld. Advocate.
For Respondents : A. Sudharshan Reddy, Ld. Advocate General on
behalf of G. Sumathi, Ld. Advocate
1. The present Application was initially filed by Mr. Ahalada Rao Vummenthala, Resolution Professional (RP) of M/s. DQ Entertainment (International) Limited (Corporate Debtor/CD), and is presently being pursued by Mr. Venka Reddy Bathina, Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor.
2. The Applicant seeks the following relief:
“To Declare the Corporate Debtor as the rightful Lease Holder of the Property situated at Plot Number 9 Sy Nos. 239 & 240, Plot No.9, Kokapet, Rajendra Nagar, Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.”
3. It is submitted that this Adjudicating Authority admitted the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of the Corporate Debtor vide order dated 17.06.2022 in C.P. (IB) No. 402/7/HDB/2020 and appointed Mr. Madhusudhan Rao Gonugunta as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). Subsequently, in the first meeting of the Committee of Creditors (CoC), the IRP was replaced by Mr. Ahalada Rao Vummenthala as the Resolution Professional, whose appointment was confirmed by this Authority vide order dated 15.09.2022 in I.A. (IBC) No. 943 of 2022.
4. It is submitted that the Corporate Debtor had taken land admeasuring Ac. 2.87 guntas in Sy. Nos. 239 & 240, Plot No. 9, Kokapet, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District from Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA/Respondent No. 1) under a registered lease deed dated 06.10.2008 for a period of 33 years, which continues to subsist. It is further submitted that the Encumbrance Certificate reflects the Corporate Debtor as the lessee even as on date.
5. The Applicant submitted that requests were made to the Respondents seeking relevant information and documents pertaining to the leased property, however, the Respondents failed to furnish the same. It is submitted that such information is es
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.