NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
MS. TEENA SARASWAT PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
M/s Kishore Associates AOP – Respondent
PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER
Delivered on 05/06/2026
The case is fixed for pronouncement of the order.
The order is pronounced in open Court vide separate sheet.
Appearance:
For the Applicant : Mr. Abhishek Naik, Adv (online)
: Ms. Teena S. Pandey, (RP-in-Person) (Online) (IA/502 & IA 503 of 2025)
Mr. Nipun Singhvi, Adv (Physical) a.w. Mr. Mayur Jugtawat, Adv (Physical) & Mr. Rahul Bhavsar, Adv (Physical) (IA 542 of 2025)
For the CoC : Mr. Rohan Patel, Proxy Adv (Online) (IA/542/2025)
For the Respondent : Mr. Nipun Singhvi, Adv (Physical) a.w. Mr. Mayur Jugtawat, Adv (Physical) & Mr. Rahul Bhavsar, Adv (Physical) (IA/502 & IA 503 of 2025)
Mr. Abhishek Naik, Adv (Online) a.w. : Ms. Teena S. Pandey, (RP-in-Person) (Online) (IA/542/2025)
J U D G E M E N T
Interlocutory Applications No. 502, 503, and 542 (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘the three IAs’) are interconnected and arise out of the same set of facts in the present matter. The issues raised in all three IAs are common/substantially the same. In view of the common questions of fact and law, it is therefore appropriate and in the interests of justice that the three IAs be taken up and decided jointly. Accordingly, all the thr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.