SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3372

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Bachu Venkat Balaram Das, Judicial Member, Ravindra Chaturvedi, Technical Member
MONTAGE ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MONTAGE MARINO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
I.A.(Dis.)-20(ND)/2024 | IB-720(ND)/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Arjit Prasad, Saloni Singh, Anuj Maheswari

The Adjudicating Authority may order the dissolution of a corporate debtor under Section 54 of the IBC, 2016, once the liquidation process is completed, assets are realized, and the liquidator demonstrates compliance with the Code and transparency in claim and transaction management.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 54 - Liquidation and Dissolution of Corporate Debtor - Petitioner sought dissolution of corporate debtor after complete liquidation of assets and closure of liquidation account.

(B) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Sections 14 and 33(5) - Moratorium - Assessment proceedings initiated by statutory authorities during moratorium are in violation of law and cannot be enforced against the liquidation process.

(C) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Regulations 32, 33, 45 - Liquidation Process - Compliance with statutory reporting, valuation disclosure, and stakeholder consultation is mandatory for dissolution.

Facts of the case:
The Liquidator of the corporate debtor filed an application under Section 54 for dissolution after concluding the liquidation process. Assets were sold via e-auction, claims verified, and stakeholders consulted. Objections were raised regarding potential statutory liabilities and PUFE transactions, which the Liquidator clarified via affidavits and audit reports.

Findings of Court:
The Court found that the Liquidator followed all required procedures, reconciled claims, conducted transparent audits, and satisfied the Adjudicating Authority that no further assets or liabilities remained and that the affairs of the corporate debtor were fully wound up.

Issues: Whether the corporate debtor should be dissolved under Section 54 and whether statutory liabilities have been adequately addressed.

Ratio Decidendi: An order of dissolution is appropriate when the liquidation process is complete, assets are realized, and the process conforms to the Code, provided that dissolution does not discharge directors or stakeholders from their independent legal liabilities under other statutes.

Result: Application for dissolution allowed.

Table of Content
1. initiation and conduct of liquidation process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. e-auction and sale of corporate assets. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. procedural compliance for dissolution application. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. handling statutory liabilities during liquidation moratorium. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
5. court's final satisfaction and order of dissolution. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50)

ORDER

PER: BACHU VENKAT BALARAM DAS, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

1. This Application has been filed by Mr. Mohan Lal Jain, the Liquidator of Vidharva Trading Private Limited, before this Adjudicating Authority under Section 54 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Regulation 45 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. The Applicant seeks the following reliefs:

“a. Allow the present Application

b. Pass an Order for the dissolution of the Corporate Debtor, i.e., M/s Vidharva Trading Private Limited under Section 54 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016;

C. Pass an Order for the extinguishment of all the liabilities of Vidharva Trading Private Limited;

d. Consequentially, discharge the Applicant, i.e., Mr. Mohan Lal Jain from the duties of Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor;

e. Direct the Registrar of Companies to take necessary action in respect of the dissolved company as per law; and

f. Pass such other further order/order(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. Brief Background of the Case

i. An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC") was filed by the Operational Creditor, i.e., Montage Enterprises Private Limited against the Corporate Debtor, Vidharva Trading Private Limited and the said application was admitted by the order of this Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 23.12.2022 and a moratorium was declared under Section 14 including the appointment of Mr. Mohan Lal Jain as an Interim Resolution Professional. Subsequently, his appointment was confirmed as Resolution Professional by this Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 17.02.2023.

ii. Thereafter, Mr. Mohan Lal Jain, the Resolution Professional, filed an Application under Section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC") for seeking Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. This Adjudicating Authority vide order dated 30.05.2023 allowed the Application filed under Section 33(2) of IBC and a moratorium was declared under Section 33(5) including the appointment of Mr. Mohan Lal Jain as the Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor.

3. It is the case of the Applicant that pursuant to the appointment of the Applicant as the Liquidator, in compliance of Section 33(b)(ii) of the Code read with Regulation 12 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, a Public Announcement in Form B of Schedule II was made on 03.06.2023, calling upon all the stakeholders to submit their claims with the Applicant on or before 29.06.2023, in Financial Express (English) - All Edition, Jansatta (Hindi) - All India Edition and Financial Express (Gujarati)- Gujarati Edition. In terms of Regulation 30 of Liquidation Regulations, the liquidator is to verify claims submitted within thirty days from last date for receipt of claims and to either admit or reject the claim, in whole or in part, as the case may be.

4. It is submitted that the Applicant had intimated the Registrar of Companies ("ROC"), NCT of Delhi & Haryana about the initiation of Liquidation Proceedings of Corporate Debtor by filing e-form INC-28. As there were no workmen/employees in the Corporate Debtor, no notice of discharge as required under Section 33(7) of the Code was required to be issued.

5. As per the Form-B published by the Applicant for receiving claims from the creditors of the Corpora

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top