NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Brightes Stephen – Appellant
Versus
THE BHAGYODAYAM COMPANY – Respondent
O R D E R
MA(C/ACT)/2/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/59/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019
MA(C/ACT)/3/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/44/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019
MA(C/ACT)/6/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/43/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019
MA(C/ACT)/11/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/55/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019
MA(C/ACT)/17/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/56/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019
Ld. Counsel, Mr. M A Shaji appears physically for the applicants. Ld. Counsel, Mr. Ashok B Shenoy appears virtually for the respondent.
Counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondents of these instant Miscellaneous Applications are not interested in filing any reply affidavit. As the respective respondents are not interested in filing the reply affidavit, the right to file reply affidavit by the respondents in individual Miscellaneous Applications stands closed.
At request, case is adjourned to 03.07.2026, for final hearing.
MA(C/ACT)/4/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/46/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019
Ld. Counsel, Mr. M A Shaji appears physically for the applicants. Ld. Counsel, Mr. Ashok B Shenoy appears virtually for the respondent.
Counsel for the respondent submitted that a reply affidavit has been filed with a delay of two days and that an applicati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.