O R D E R

MA(C/ACT)/2/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/59/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

MA(C/ACT)/3/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/44/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

MA(C/ACT)/6/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/43/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

MA(C/ACT)/11/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/55/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

MA(C/ACT)/17/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/56/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

Ld. Counsel, Mr. M A Shaji appears physically for the applicants. Ld. Counsel, Mr. Ashok B Shenoy appears virtually for the respondent.

Counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondents of these instant Miscellaneous Applications are not interested in filing any reply affidavit. As the respective respondents are not interested in filing the reply affidavit, the right to file reply affidavit by the respondents in individual Miscellaneous Applications stands closed.

At request, case is adjourned to 03.07.2026, for final hearing.

MA(C/ACT)/4/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/46/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

Ld. Counsel, Mr. M A Shaji appears physically for the applicants. Ld. Counsel, Mr. Ashok B Shenoy appears virtually for the respondent.

Counsel for the respondent submitted that a reply affidavit has been filed with a delay of two days and that an application seeking condonation of the delay has also been filed. Counsel for the applicant stated that he has no objection to the delay being condoned.

Accordingly, the Registry is directed to entertain the reply affidavit filed by the respondent and the Registry would not press the objection regarding the delay in filing the same, if it is otherwise in order. In view of the above, the delay condonation application, IA(C/Act)/124/KOB/2026, filed by the respondent, stands infructuous and disposed of.

The applicant is granted liberty to file a rejoinder, if any, within 10 (Ten) days.

At request, case is adjourned to 03.07.2026.

MA(C/ACT)/5/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/49/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

Ld. Counsel, Mr. M A Shaji appears physically for the applicants. Ld. Counsel, Mr. Ashok B Shenoy appears virtually for the respondent.

Counsel for the respondent submitted that a reply affidavit has been filed with a delay of two days and that an application seeking condonation of the delay has also been filed. Counsel for the applicant stated that he has no objection to the delay being condoned.

Accordingly, the Registry is directed to entertain the reply affidavit filed by the respondent and the Registry would not press the objection regarding the delay in filing the same, if it is otherwise in order. In view of the above, the delay condonation application, IA(C/Act)/129/KOB/2026, filed by the respondent, stands infructuous and disposed of.

The applicant is granted liberty to file a rejoinder, if any, within 10 (Ten) days.

At request, case is adjourned to 03.07.2026.

MA(C/ACT)/7/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/51/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

Ld. Counsel, Mr. M A Shaji appears physically for the applicants. Ld. Counsel, Mr. Ashok B Shenoy appears virtually for the respondent.

Counsel for the respondent submitted that a reply affidavit has been filed with a delay of two days and that an application seeking condonation of the delay has also been filed. Counsel for the applicant stated that he has no objection to the delay being condoned.

Accordingly, the Registry is directed to entertain the reply affidavit filed by the respondent and the Registry would not press the objection regarding the delay in filing the same, if it is otherwise in order. In view of the above, the delay condonation application, IA(C/Act)/126/KOB/2026, filed by the respondent, stands infructuous and disposed of.

The applicant is granted liberty to file a rejoinder, if any, within 10 (Ten) days.

At request, case is adjourned to 03.07.2026.

MA(C/ACT)/8/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/54/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

Ld. Counsel, Mr. M A Shaji appears physically for the applicants. Ld. Counsel, Mr. Ashok B Shenoy appears virtually for the respondent.

Counsel for the respondent submitted that a reply affidavit has been filed wi