SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3495

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Brightes Stephen – Appellant
Versus
THE BHAGYODAYAM COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Adv. Ashok B Shenoy

O R D E R

MA(C/ACT)/2/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/59/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

MA(C/ACT)/3/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/44/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

MA(C/ACT)/6/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/43/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

MA(C/ACT)/11/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/55/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

MA(C/ACT)/17/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/56/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

Ld. Counsel, Mr. M A Shaji appears physically for the applicants. Ld. Counsel, Mr. Ashok B Shenoy appears virtually for the respondent.

Counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondents of these instant Miscellaneous Applications are not interested in filing any reply affidavit. As the respective respondents are not interested in filing the reply affidavit, the right to file reply affidavit by the respondents in individual Miscellaneous Applications stands closed.

At request, case is adjourned to 03.07.2026, for final hearing.

MA(C/ACT)/4/KOB/2026 IN MA(C/ACT)/46/KOB/2022 in TCP/21/KOB/2019

Ld. Counsel, Mr. M A Shaji appears physically for the applicants. Ld. Counsel, Mr. Ashok B Shenoy appears virtually for the respondent.

Counsel for the respondent submitted that a reply affidavit has been filed with a delay of two days and that an applicati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top