SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3663

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Prabhat Kumar, Technical Member, Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey, Judicial Member
Shrikant Khadilkar – Appellant
Versus
Bhaskar Gopal Shetty – Respondent
IA(I.B.C)/430(MB)2026 | C.P. (IB)/571(MB)2019



Advocates:
For the Petitioner:MDP Associates
For the Respondent:BHASKAR GOPAL SHETTY

A 'transactional set-off' is permissible under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code where claims and counterclaims are closely linked and connected, even during liquidation, to prevent manifest injustice, provided the set-off requirement is fully established and mutual.

Headnote:The applicants filed an interlocutory application seeking to set off amounts they were directed to pay the Corporate Debtor under Section 43 and 45 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against amounts allegedly owed to them by the Corporate Debtor as per audited financial statements. The court examined the claims for set-off regarding mutual dealings and the applicability of Regulation 29 of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. The tribunal determined that set-off for one applicant was impermissible due to lack of direct mutual dealings, but permissible for the other based on the principle of transactional set-off as established by the Supreme Court. Issues centered on whether the tribunal could permit a set-off of directed payments against dues owed to claimants by the Corporate Debtor. The Ratio Decidendi relies on the interpretation of Regulation 29 and the Supreme Court's ruling in Bharti Airtel Limited vs. Vijaykumar V. Iyer, which permits 'transactional set-off' when claims and counterclaims are linked/connected, making bifurcation manifestly unjust. The court held that where a transaction is compensatory in nature, such as a shortfall in fair value of goods, set-off aligns with equitable principles. The application is partly allowed.

Table of Content
1. parties seeking to offset liquidation liabilities with corporate debtor debts. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. distinction between independent transactions vs linked transactional set-off. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. partial allowance of application for transactional set-off based on legal precedents. (Para 12)
ORDER

IA(I.B.C)/430( MB)2026 in C.P. (IB)/571(MB)2019

1) Ld. Counsel for the Parties are present.

2) The present Interlocutory Application is filed by Shrikant Khadilkar proprietor of Mirage Ceramics (Applicant No. 1) & Devyani Khadilkar proprietor of M/s Creation (Applicant No. 2), praying for the following reliefs:

a. Declare that the Applicant No. 1 is entitled to recover Rs. 7,85,41,119/- (Rupees Seven Crore Eighty Five Lakh Forty One Thousand One Hundred and Nineteen Only) and Applicant No. 2 is entitled to recover Rs. 1,49,89,864/- (Rupees One Crore Forty Nine Lakh Eighty Nine Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty Four Only), aggregating to Rs. 9,35,30,983/- (Rupees Nine Crore Thirty Five Lakh Thirty Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty Three Only) from the Corporate Debtor as reflected in the Audited Financial Statements;

b. Declare that the amounts aggregating to Rs. 26,46,077/- (Rupees Twenty Six Lakh Forty Six Thousand Seventy Seven Only) payable by the Applicant No.1 to the Corporate Debtor vide order dated 10th October, 2025 passed by Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench-I in IA No. 935/2021 and IA No. 2103/2024 in Company Petition No. 571 (MB) of 2019 be set off against the corresponding amount of Rs. 7,85,41,119/- (Rupees Seven Crore Eighty Five Lakh Forty One Thousand One Hundred and Nineteen Only) due to the Applicant No. 1 since they are mutual dealings and hence liable to be set-off;

c. Declare that the amount of Rs. 93,000/- (Rupees Ninety Three Thousand Only) payable by the Applicant No.2 to the Corporate Debtor vide order dated 10th October, 2025 passed by Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench-I in IA No. 935/2021 and IA No. 2103/2024 in Company Petition No. 571 (MB) of 2019 be set-off against the corresponding amount of Rs. 1,49,89,864/- (Rupees One Crore Forty Nine Lakh Eighty Nine Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty Four Only) due to the Applicant No. 2 since they are mutual dealings and hence liable to be set-off;

d. Direct the Respondent to set-off mutual dealings between the Applicants and the Corporate Debtor as specified in prayer clause (b) and (c) above;

e. Pending the final disposal of this interlocutory application this Hon’ble Tribunal be pleased to stay the enforcement and recovery of amounts payable by the Applicants to the Corporate Debtor as specified in the order dated 10th October, 2025 passed by Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench-I in IA No. 935/2021 and IA No. 2103/2024 in Company Petition No. 571 (MB) of 2019 aggregating to Rs. 27,39,077/- (Rupees Twenty Seven Lakh Thirty Nine Thousand and Seventy Seven Only);

3) Vide Order dated 10.10.2025, passed by this Tribunal in IA No. 935 of 2021 and IA No. 2103 of 2024 in the captioned Petition, M/s Mirage Ceramics, the proprietary firm of Applicant No. 1, was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 26,46,077/- and M/s Creation, the proprietary firm of Applicant No. 2, was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 93,000/- in terms of Section 43 & 45 of IBC. The Corporate Debtor owes certain amounts to the Applicants, accordingly, the Applicants by way of the present Application are seeking directions to the Resolution Professional (now Liquidator) to set-off amounts directed to be paid by this Adjudicating Authority against the monies owed to them by the Corporate Debtor as reflected in the Audited Financial Statement.

4) The Respondent herein was appointed as the Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor vide order of this Adjudicating Authority dt. 15.06.2023, passed in IA 1487 of 2021.

5) It is submitted that the directions issued in the Order of this Adjudicating Authority, require the Applicants to make payment of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top