Back
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Prabhat Kumar, Technical Member, Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey, Judicial Member
Kishore Kakumal Keswani – Appellant
Versus
Manohar Kakumal Keswani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural delays and lack of bona fide intent in filing amendments. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 17) |
| 2. discretionary power to allow intervention independently of amendment applications. (Para 3) |
| 3. the principles governing the exercise of judicial discretion to allow amendment of pleadings. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. rejection of amendments due to lack of merit, delay, and introducing time-barred claims. (Para 16 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 5. summary dismissal of the application. (Para 34) |
ORDER
Per : CORAM
1) This Company Application CA 28/2026 is filed on 29.01.2026 by Kishore Kakumal Keswani, the original petitioner in Company Petition 1300 of 2020, under the provisions of Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 ("NCLT Rules") read with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 ("Act") seeking certain amendments to the Company Petition No.1300 of 2020 ("Company Petition") stated to be important. The present application was filed after more than two months of order dated 6.11.2025 when the Applicant, through his counsel, had sought adjournment on this ground, and after this Tribu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
