Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Prakash Shrivastava, Chairperson, Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, A. Senthil Vel, Expert Member
National Highway Authority of India – Appellant
Versus
Prem Mohan Gaur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review limited to apparent errors, not reargument. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. principal executor liable despite subcontractors. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. national importance no excuse for violations. (Para 7) |
| 4. encroachment on nallahs illegal regardless of acquisition. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. gochar land use unchanged without legal conversion. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. environmental compensation due for illegal tree felling. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. ponds protected under environmental laws. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 8. no merit; review application dismissed. (Para 22 , 23) |
ORDER
BY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER
1. This Review Application has come up at the instance of National Highway Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘Review applicant’ with the prayer to review and set aside order dated 13.04.2024 passed by this Tribunal in Original Application No. 892/2022, Prem Mohan Gaur vs. National Highway Authority of India & Others. Several grounds have been taken in Review Application. Virtually, there is an attempt to reargue the matter in detail. This is not permissible in Review Application and a review applicant cannot be allowed to reargue the matter by way
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
