Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
SHEO KUMAR SINGH, Judicial Member, A SENTHIL VEL, Expert Member
Navratanlal Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Hemraj Meena – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. original order prohibits constructions in eco-sensitive zone. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. directs applicant to seek demarcation from authorities. (Para 3) |
| 3. review lies only for new evidence or apparent error. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. recall power limited to fraud, lack of jurisdiction, or court mistake. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. counsel's failure to argue not grounds for review. (Para 20) |
| 6. review dismissed; pursue alternate demarcation remedy. (Para 21 , 22) |
ORDER
1. This Tribunal while considering the relevant facts narrated by the parties in Original Application No. 153/2023 (CZ), titled Hemraj Meena Vs. Union of India & Ors., relating to illegal permanent construction within the boundaries of Nahargarh Wildlife Sanctuary, eco-sensitive zone passed an order as follows :-
1. “In view of the above discussion and the records conclusions and directions are as follows:-
1. Khasra No. 134 and 135 of village Nahargarh are integral part of the Nahargarh Wildlife Sanctuary.
2. The commercial establishments of hotels and resorts are enumerated at serial No. 12 of the list of activities prohibited or to be regulated and as per Serial No. 12 and 13, no
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
