SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 1828

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CHENNAI (SOUTHERN ZONE BENCH)
MICHAEL LAMBERT JEHAN – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD – Respondent


ORDER

1. The review applicant is the 3rd respondent in the Appeal. The Appeal was filed challenging the order of the Pollution Control Appellate Authority’s closure order dated 06.12.2019 issued against the review applicant which was set aside by the appellate authority.

2. The appeal was disposed on merits holding that the review applicant had complied with all the conditions of consent as well as directions issued by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. However, the 3rd party appellant had challenged the maintainability of the Appeal against the composite order giving directions under Section 31(A) of the Air (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and Section 33 (A) of the Water (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act, 1974.

3. The review applicant has submitted that Section 31 of the Air (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act, 1981 includes orders in the nature of directions issued under Section 31(A) of the Air (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act, 1981 also. He has also submitted that against composite orders separate appeals can be filed one under the Air (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act, 1981 before the Appellate Authority and another under the Wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top