Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 1668

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Mr. Arvind Nayyar, Sr. Adv., Mr. R.K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. (with Mr. Aman Jha, Adv.), Mr. Pratap Thakur, Adv., Mr. Rishi Tutu, Adv.
For Respondent(s): Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Sr. Adv. (Mr. Shoeb Hasan Khan, Adv., Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Adv. and Mr. Samresh Katare, Adv.), Mr. Arvind Verma, Sr. Adv., Mr. R.B. Mathur, Sr. Adv. (with Achint Kumar, Adv.), Mr. Om Shankar Shrivastava, Adv., Mr. Sachin K. Verma, Adv. (with Ms. Harshita Tejwani, Adv.), Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv., Mr. Ravikant Patidar, Adv., Mr. Sandeep Singh Patidar, Adv., Mr. Prateek Singh Baghel, Adv.

Table of Content
1. hearing proceedings and filings noted. (Para 1 , 2)
2. e-auctions challenge for non-compliance with dsr. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. intervenors' auction participation and objections. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. high court upheld dsr and auction validity. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. supreme court directed cec sand mining oversight. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. supreme court approved cec recommendations. (Para 16)
7. desilting restrained pending ec. (Para 17 , 18)
8. environmental judgments on sand mining impacts. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
9. dsr preparation and monitoring guidelines. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
10. dsr compliance affirmed by authorities. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
11. interveners lack locus post-auction participation. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
12. strict ssmg-2016 and emgsm-2020 compliance. (Para 56)
13. application dismissed per higher court orders. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61)

ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the record.

2. The respondent has filed the reply and applicant has filed the rejoinder to the reply filed by Respondent no. 1 and Respondent no. 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 1668

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert MemberDr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent