SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 62

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, Dr. Arun Kumar Verma, JJ
SUBHASH DATTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
151/2022 / KOLKATA



Advocates:
Mr. Subhas Dutta, in person; Mr. Rajib Ray, Adv. for State Respondents; Mr. Sibojyoti Chakrabarti, Adv. for R-4; Mr. Nayan Chand Bihani, Sr. Adv. a/w Mr. Soumya Mukherjee, Adv. for R-5 (in Virtual Mode); Mr. Survapriya Mukherjee, Adv. a/w Mr. Aritra Basu, Adv. and Mr. Saaqib Siddiqui, Adv. for R-10 (in Virtual Mode); Mr. Dipanjan Ghosh, Adv. for R-12; Mr. Ashok Prasad, Adv. for R-13 (in Virtual Mode); Mr. Anindya Lahiri, Sr. Adv. a/w Mr. Arkadipta Sengupta, Adv., Mr. Parikshit Lakhotia, Adv. and Mr. Debashis Karmakar, Adv. for R-14

Construction in CRZ-IA and on the seaward side of existing roads is prohibited under the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011, emphasizing the need for compliance with environmental regulations.

Headnote:(A) Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2011 - Prohibited activities within CRZ - Construction of amusement park and other structures in violation of CRZ regulations - The constructions were found to be within CRZ-IA and on the seaward side of the existing road, which is prohibited under the CRZ Notification. (Paras 60-64)

(B) Environmental Protection - The court emphasized the importance of adhering to environmental regulations to protect coastal areas. (Paras 78-80)

Facts of the case:
The applicant alleged that various constructions, including a 'Beach Front Beautification Amusement Park' and a 'Jagannath Dham Sanskriti Kendra,' were being developed in violation of the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification. Evidence included photographs and reports indicating unauthorized constructions and improper waste management.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the constructions were illegal as they violated the CRZ Notification, specifically regarding the location and nature of the structures.

Issues: The main issues included whether the constructions were permissible under the CRZ Notification and the legality of the ongoing projects.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that constructions in CRZ-IA and on the seaward side of the existing road are prohibited, emphasizing the need for compliance with environmental regulations.

Result: All illegal constructions must be removed and the area restored to its original form within three months.

ORDER

3. Mr. Subhas Datta, the Applicant is present in person.

4. The allegation of the Applicant in this Original Application is that in and around the Digha Beach Dhuesagar, a ‘Beach Front Beautification Amusement Park’ is being developed as a ‘Tourist Centre’ on the sea-beach of Digha. These constructions are alleged to be in violation of the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification (CRZ Notification) and are being carried out by the Urban Development and Municipal Affairs Department, Government of West Bengal. Photographs as Annexure-P/1, Annexure-P/2, Annexure-P/3, Annexure-P/4, Annexure-P/5, Annexure-P/6, Annexure-P/7 & Annexure-P/8 (pages 19-28) to the Original Application, including Google Earth Imagery as Annexure-P/9 (pages 29-33) to the Original Application, have also been filed by way of evidence to show various constructions having been made.

5. Photographs with regard to the flooding of High Tidal Wave at Seashore of Digha have also been filed as Annexure-P/10 and Annexure-P/11 (pages 34-37) to the Original Application.

6. Annexure-P/12 & Annexure-P/13 (pages 38, 38A and 39) are the photographs of constructions alleged to have been made within the CRZ area.

7. It is also alleged that the site in question has become a dumping ground for garbage which has not been removed and there is absolutely no observation of Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016. Photographs as Annexure-P/14, Annexure-P/15, Annexure-P/16, Annexure-P/17 & Annexure-P/18, (pages 40 to 56) to the Original Application have also been filed in this regard.

8. It is also alleged that a ‘Jagannath Dham Sanskriti Kendra’ is also being constructed on sand dunes at Digha. Photographs as Annexure P-/19, Annexure-P/20 & Annexure-P/21 (pages 57 to 65) to the Original Application have also been filed in this regard.

9. It is also alleged that though a Sewerage Treatment Plant (STP) has been constructed at Digha, (Annexure-P/22, page 66 of the paper book), but the untreated water is being allowed to flow directly into the sea-beach where large number of members of public can be seen at page nos. 68-69 (Annexure-P/23 to the Original Application).

10. The Respondent No.9, State Level Ground Water Authority, has filed affidavit dated 03.01.2023 stating that by letter dated 09.12.2022, the Member Secretary, District Level Ground Water Resource Development Authority (‘DLGWRDA’ for short) had informed that 12 permissions for groundwater have been granted and as per Report from the Digha Sankarpur Development Authority (‘DSDA’ for short) approximately 600 hotels are present but during field inspections, it was noted that there are other commercial and industrial units and, therefore, notices were issued to them for unauthorized abstraction of groundwater and an Inspection-cum-Action Taken Report was also prepared dated 20.12.2022. It is, however, stated that regular raid for unauthorised abstraction of groundwater is now taking place and notices have been served to the violators so that illegal groundwater pumping can be stopped.

11. The Respondent No.2, Urban Development & Municipal Affairs Department, Government of West Bengal (‘UDMA’ for short), has filed its affidavit dated 03.01.2023 and it is stated that the Town & Country Planning Branch of the Department has taken the following actions for short term, midterm and long-term measures for planning of Digha Coastal Region. The action taken is as under:-

“a) Master plan for redevelopment of Digha coastline has been taken up to make Digha a resilient and economy generating tourist hub in consultation with all stakeholder Departments and Statutory Bodies following several site visits and meeting with all stakeholders.

b) After the cyclone, on emergency basis the restoration and detailed investigation of work started with entire manpower. Costs of the damages are required. A synopsis of damage and cost has been calculated which is to the tune of Rs.45 crores.

c) On emergency basis, restoration of stalls, crematorium has been done.

d)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top