2021 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 414
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Adarsh Kumar Goel, Chairperson, Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, M. Sathyanarayanan, Judicial Member, Brijesh Sethi, Judicial Member, Nagin Nanda, Expert Member
Rajiv Narayan & Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondent
M.A. No. 33/2021 & 34/2021 | Original Application No. 804/2017
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Raj Panjwani, Rahul Choudhary
For the Respondents: Shuvodeep Roy, Avi Singh, Shiven Varma
Review applications on environmental compliance are dismissed for lack of merit; non-compliance with hazardous waste management rules mandates compensation under the polluter pays principle.
Headnote:(A) Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 - Review applications regarding compliance with statutory obligations to set up Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF) - Supreme Court directions acknowledged on enforcement - States liable for compensation for failure to comply - The tribunal dismissed applications citing continuing violation of statutory rules and environmental damage. (Paras 1, 3, 5)
(B) Statutory obligations - Liability for non-compliance arises under the ‘polluter pays principle’ as part of sustainable development which is integral to the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution - The plea that compensation is a penalty is invalid; liability is based on absolute liability rather than fault. (Paras 4, 5)
Facts of the case:
Review applications submitted by applicants for exemption from liability to pay environmental compensation as stipulated by tribunal orders for not setting up TSDF despite the time lapsed.
Findings of Court:
The tribunal dismissed applications for non-compliance stating statutory obligations and potential hazards posed to public health and the environment.
Issues: Examination of waiver requests for compensation under the statutory obligations and evaluation of grounds for challenging the compensation demand.
Ratio Decidendi: The tribunal upheld the necessity of compliance with environmental management rules and highlighted that defiant behavior towards compliance undermines rule of law and accountability.
Result: The applications are dismissed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review of compliance with hazardous waste statutes. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. liability for environmental damage established. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
ORDER
M.A. No. 33/2021
1. This application is in the nature of review of earlier orders of this Tribunal dated 26.08.2019 and 07.07.2020 directing Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) to recover compensation from the States which failed to comply with the statutory obligation of setting up Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF), under the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 (HoWM Rules). The Tribunal considered the matter in the light of directions of the Hon(cid:146)ble Supreme Court in (2005) 10 SCC 510 and (2012) 7 SCC 769 and further order of the Hon(cid:146)ble Supreme Court dated 18.07.2018 in The Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Natural Resource Policy Vs. Union of India & Ors., whereby the proceedings were transferred to this Tribunal. The Tribunal constituted a Monitoring Committee for compliance of the HoWM Rules which suggested various measures to be taken by the concerned authorities in view of continuing violation of the Rules preventing damage to the environment. The Tribunal accordingly issued directions in the light of the said recommendations inter alia as follows:
VI. Directions:
iii. As already directed, all the States which have not set up TSDF may do so and the States which fail to set up the same up to 31.03.2020, will be liable to pay environmental compensation of Rs. 10 lakh per month. However, with regard to States which may be categorized as small States, having regard to the quantum and nature of generation of hazardous waste, the liability to pay compensation will start from 01.01.2021. The categorization based on threshold limit of generation of hazardous waste be made by the CPCB within one month from today and placed on its website.
2. Since the State of Assam has been required to pay compensation in pursuance of above directions, it has filed the present application to the effect that TSDF could not be set up on account of delay in taking several steps.
3. We do not find any merit in the application. Admittedly, TSDF has still not been set up, as statutorily mandated though the rules have been in place atleast for the last five years and directions of the Hon(cid:146)ble Supreme Court are even earlier. In absence, there is continuing violation of the statutory rules, framed under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and consequential damage to the environment. In these circumstances, prayer for waiver of compensation for admitted violation cannot be entertained.
The application is dismissed.
M.A. No. 34/2021
4. This application is for rehearing of M.A. Nos. 22 and 23 of 2021 earlier filed by the applicant which were dismissed on 05.04.2021 as follows:
1. These applications have been filed, in a decided matter, by the Chhattisgarh State Industrial Corporation Ltd. (CSIDC) for modification of order of this Tribunal dated 07.07.2020 (wrongly mentioned as dated 1.7.2020) and also for stay of order dated 23.11.2020 passed by the CPCB, in the light of the said order.
2. We may first refer to the order in question which dealt with the issue of remedial action against non-compliance of Hazardous and Other Waste (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2019 (HOWM Rules). The Tribunal referred to the alarming situation created by unscientific dumping of hazardous waste, as noticed by the Honble Supreme Court in The Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Natural Resource Policy v. UOI & Ors.