Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 1671

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Mr. Arvind Nayyar, Sr. Adv., Mr. R.K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. (with Mr. Aman Jha, Adv.), Mr. Pratap Thakur, Adv., Mr. Rishi Tutu, Adv.
For Respondent(s): Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Sr. Adv. (Mr. Shoeb Hasan Khan, Adv., Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Adv. and Mr. Samresh Katare, Adv.), Mr. Arvind Verma, Sr. Adv., Mr. R.B. Mathur, Sr. Adv. (with Achint Kumar, Adv.), Mr. Om Shankar Shrivastava, Adv., Mr. Sachin K. Verma, Adv. (with Ms. Harshita Tejwani, Adv.), Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv., Mr. Ravikant Patidar, Adv., Mr. Sandeep Singh Patidar, Adv., Mr. Prateek Singh Baghel, Adv.

Table of Content
1. procedural hearing and filings overview (Para 1 , 2)
2. applicant's challenge to e-auctions without dsr compliance (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. intervenors' participation and post-auction objections (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 50)
4. high court rejection of similar dsr challenges (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. supreme court directives on sand mining compliance (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. applicant's environmental protection arguments (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
7. dsr preparation and ec prerequisites under emgsm-2020 (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
8. tribunal and supreme court guidelines on dsr/ec (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
9. respondents' compliance with dsr approval and sop (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
10. intervenors' locus and blacklisting under rmmcr-2017 (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)
11. directions for ssmg-2016 and emgsm-2020 enforcement (Para 55 , 56)
12. application disposed per higher court orders (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61)

ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the record.

2. The respondent has filed the reply and applicant has filed the rejoinder to the reply filed by Respondent no. 1 and Respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 1671

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert MemberDr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent