NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural hearing and filings reviewed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. e-auctions violate dsr and emgsm cluster rules. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. intervenors claim misrepresentation in auction process. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. high court upheld dsr validity and auctions. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. supreme court cec recommendations on sand mining. (Para 12) |
| 6. state complies with guidelines; desilting insufficient. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. desilting operations stayed pending supreme court. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. supreme court mandates on environmental safeguards. (Para 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 9. dsr preparation and ec procedures mandatory. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 10. tribunal and supreme court on dsr prerequisites. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 11. dsr approved; plots delineated per sop. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 12. intervenors lack locus; auctions follow rules. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 13. ias dismissed; contractual issues not ngt domain. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 14. enforce ssmg/emgsm; oa disposed per court orders. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
ORDER
1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the record.
2. The respondent has filed the reply and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.