SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 1125

Item No. 02:
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI (Through video conference)
Original Application No. 150 of 2020 (SZ)
IN THE MATTER OF:
Tribunal on its own motion-SUO MOTU Based on the News item in Dinamalar Tamil Newspaper, Chennai Edition dated 07.08.2020,“ Puthagaram Thangal Lake is endangered to disappear in maps”.
With The Principal Secretary to Government Public Works Department, Govt. Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600 009 and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Date of Judgment: 15.07.2022 CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. SATYAGOPAL KORLAPATI, EXPERT MEMBER For Applicant(s): By Court For Respondent(s): Dr. D. Shanmuganathan for R1 to R4 & R6 Mr. S. Sai Sathya Jith for R5 Mr. Gautam S. Raman for R7 Smt. P.T. Rama Devi through Mr. Raghul Adithya for R8
ORDER
Judgment pronounced through Video Conference. The original application is disposed of with directions vide separate Judgment. Pending interlocutory application, if any, shall stands disposed of.
Sd/-
Justice K. Ramakrishnan, J.M.
Sd/-
Dr. Satyagopal Korlapati, E.M.
O.A. No. 150/2020(SZ)
15th July 2022. Sr.
Item No. 02: Court No.1 BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI (Through video conference)
Original Application No. 150 of 2020 (SZ)
IN THE MATTER OF:
Tribunal on its own motion-SUO MOTU Based on the News item in Dinamalar Tamil Newspaper, Chennai Edition dated 07.08.2020,“ Puthagaram Thangal Lake is endangered to disappear in maps”.
With
1. The Principal Secretary to Government Public Works Department, Govt. Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600 009.
2. The Additional Chief Secretary to Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Govt. Secretariat, Fort George Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 009.
3. The Secretary to Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Department of Environment, Govt. Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600 009.
4. Additional Chief Secretary to Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Govt. Secretariat, Fort. George Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600 009.
5. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, No. 76, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 032.

6. The District Collector, Chennai District, District Collectorate Office, No. 62, Rajaji Salai, 4th Floor, Chennai – 600 001.
7. Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board, Rep. by its Managing Director, No.1, Pumping station Road, Chintadripet, Chennai -600- 031.
8. Greater Chennai Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Ripon Building, Chennai 600 003. ...Respondent(s)
For Applicant(s): Suo Motu by Court For Respondent(s): Dr. D. Shanmuganathan for R1 to R4 & R6.
Mr. S. Sai Sathya Jith for R5.
Mr. Gautam s. Raman for R7. Smt. P.T. Rama Devi through Mr. Raghul Adithya for R8.
Judgment Reserved on: 05th July 2022.
Judgment Pronounced on: 15th July 2022.
CORAM HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE Dr. SATYAGOPAL KORLAPATI, EXPERT MEMBER Whether the Judgment is allowed to be published on the Internet – Yes.
Whether the Judgment is to be published in the All India NGT Reporter – Yes.

JUDGMENT

1. The above case was Suo Motu registered by this Tribunal on the basis of the news paper report published in Dinamalar Chennai City Supplement tiuglj;jpy; ,Ue;J Edition dated, 07.08.2020 under the caption

2. It was alleged in the newspaper report that Puthagaram Thangal Lake was having an extent of 42.36 acres – near Highways road at 24th Ward, Puthagaram, Madhavaram Zone, Chennai.

3. Most of the area of the lake and its feeder canals have been encroached by private concerns and become housing plots un-authorisedely and some of the people in that locality who had encroached and reduced the area had created false documents and with the help of the local politicians and the Revenue Department, converted the same into housing plots and sold them for higher prices. Though there was a direction given by the Hon‟ble High court of Madras to remove the encroachment, no effective steps have been taken. Though some steps were taken to remove the encroachment by demolishing the unauthorisedly constructed houses, but later due to the stay order granted by the Hon‟ble High Court of Madras, further steps have not been taken after the declaration of assembly election.

4. The Chennai Metro Water Supply Sewerage Board also encroached the lake area and built a Sewage Treatment Plant. Later, it has become a dumping place for solid wastes and also for discharging untreated sewage water. Unless certain steps were taken to rejuvenate this lake, it was likely to be vanished from the records and on ground as well.

5. After reiterating the responsibility of the State to protect the water body and environment as contemplated under Article 48 (A) of the Constitution of India and reiterated by the Hon‟ble Apex Court, as well as various High Courts and also the National Green Tribunal, including Hon‟ble High Court of Madras, Since this Tribunal was satisfied that there arose a substantial question of environment, the matter was admitted.

6. On 17.08.2020, it was informed by the Government Pleader that this area falls within the jurisdiction of Thiruvallur District, originally impleaded as 6th respondent was substituted by the District Collector, Thiruvallur District instead of the District Collector, Chennai District as per order dated 17.08.2020.

7. Thereafter, this Tribunal had appointed Joint committee consisting of 1)The District Collector, Thiruvallur District or a Senior Officer not below the rank of Assistant Collector or Sub Divisional Magistrate deputed by the District Collector 2) Superintending Engineer of Public Works Department and Water Resources Organisation, who is in charge of that area, 3) Senior Officer from Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board 4) Commissioner or a Senior Officer designated by the Commissioner of Greater Chennai Corporation, and 5) Senior Officer from the Chairman Tamil Nadu State Pollution Control Board as deputed by its Chairman to inspect the area in question and submit a factual as well as action taken report if there was any violation found.

8. The committee was directed to ascertain:

i) the original extent covered by the lake as per original revenue records and the extent of encroachment, action taken to remove the same and restore it and the action taken to protect the same from future encroachment and pollution.

ii) The committee as well as the Tamil Nadu State Pollution Control Board were directed to report about the stage of implementation of the directions issued by the Hon‟ble High Court of Madras regarding the removal of encroachment and its stage of compliance.

iii) Whether there was any scheme launched by the State Government or by the District administration for the purpose of rejuvenation and protection of this water body, if so, what was the stage of its implementation and iv) Whether there was any unauthorised dumping of garbage or discharge of untreated sewage into the lake happending and if so, trace out the persons who were responsible for the same and take appropriate action includi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top