Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 1427

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Mr. Arvind Nayyar, Sr. Adv., Mr. R.K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. (with Mr. Aman Jha, Adv.), Mr. Pratap Thakur, Adv., Mr. Rishi Tutu, Adv.
For Respondent(s): Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Sr. Adv. (Mr. Shoeb Hasan Khan, Adv., Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Adv. and Mr. Samresh Katare, Adv.), Mr. Arvind Verma, Sr. Adv., Mr. R.B. Mathur, Sr. Adv. (with Achint Kumar, Adv.), Mr. Om Shankar Shrivastava, Adv., Mr. Sachin K. Verma, Adv. (with Ms. Harshita Tejwani, Adv.), Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv., Mr. Ravikant Patidar, Adv., Mr. Sandeep Singh Patidar, Adv., Mr. Prateek Singh Baghel, Adv.

Table of Content
1. hearing proceedings and filings noted. (Para 1 , 2)
2. e-auctions violate emgsm-2020 clustering rules. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. intervenors claim misrepresentation in auctions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 50)
4. high court upheld dsr validity, rejected stays. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. supreme court orders permit regulated sand mining. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
6. dsr approvals and inspections comply with guidelines. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
7. court precedents emphasize environmental safeguards. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
8. emgsm-2020 mandates dsr before auctions. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
9. dsr prepared with public consultation, committee approvals. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
10. intervenors lack locus after auction participation. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
11. i.as. dismissed as contractual, not environmental. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
12. oa disposed upholding compliance, directing guidelines enforcement. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61)

ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the record.

2. The respondent has filed the reply and applicant has filed the rejoinder to the reply filed by Respondent no.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 1427

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert MemberDr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent