ORDER

IA No. 108/2023:

1. Heard Learned Counsel appearing for the parties. The explanation for filing this Review Application beyond period of limitation has been satisfactorily explained. Application for seeking condonation of delay is allowed.

Review application No. 04/2023:

2. It is a Review Application filed by two review applicants i.e., Shri Jagdish Prasad Jaat i.e., respondent 9 in Original Application (hereinafter referred to as ‘OA’) and Smt. Geeta Devi Jaat, wife of Shri Jagdish Prasad Jaat who was impleaded through office as Sarpanch Gram Rayla as responded 7 in OA seeking review of our judgment dated 24.07.2023 passed in OA 91/2022(CZ)

3. The contention is that survey no. 739/1 is not part of survey no. 739 but is a separate khasra no. and hence, it is not a part of Dharam talab.

4. Learned Counsel appearing for review applicant, however, could not dispute that original survey no. 739 does not exist since it has been bifurcated in khasra no. 739/1 and 739/2 and, therefore, the basic ground for review has no substance.

5. The other ground mentioned in Review Application is that survey no. 739 does not exist and we find answer from the record that since it has been bifurcated a