SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 176

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Adarsh Kumar Goel, CJ, Sheo Kumar Singh, J, Nagin Nanda, ACJ
Deepak Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. – Respondent
Original Application No. 211/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr. Siddhartha Iyer
For the Respondents: Mr. Mukesh Verma, Mr. Sanyat Lodha

CPCB guidelines must be adhered to for petrol pump siting to ensure public safety and environmental compliance, irrespective of prior NOCs.

Headnote:(A) Environmental Protection Act, 1986 - Norms and Guidelines - CPCB Guidelines dated 07.01.2020 regarding siting criteria for petrol pumps - Complainant raised grievance against petrol pump's location near schools and high-tension wires - Earlier NOC granted by authorities in contravention of guidelines was challenged - Joint Committee constituted to evaluate compliance with safety measures. (Paras 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10)

(B) Safety and Environmental Precautions - Argument that CPCB guidelines do not apply due to prior issuance of Letter of Intent rejected - Emphasis on precautionary principles to ensure environmental and public safety - Responsibilities for compliance outlined. (Para 7)

Facts of the case:
The proposed petrol pump site raised concerns regarding its proximity to schools and high-tension power lines, conflicting with CPCB guidelines. Historical NOCs were granted based on earlier criteria leading to legal confusion. These guidelines were established to ensure safety in urban areas.

Findings of Court:
Application disposed of; joint Committee tasked with making a decision regarding the safety of the proposed petrol pump site and compliance with CPCB guidelines. NOC no longer in effect until resolution of the Committee.

Issues: Whether the NOC for the petrol pump violates CPCB guidelines based on its location relative to schools and other hazards; the retrospective application of guidelines to previously approved sites.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that CPCB guidelines, aimed at protecting public health and safety, must be adhered to regardless of prior approvals; concerns about environmental risk necessitate compliance with safety measures at proposed retail outlets. The Committee is to assess ongoing compliance with regulations.

Result: Application disposed of; mandate for joint Committee to review safety criteria.

Table of Content
1. cpcb guidelines on petrol pump siting location. (Para 1 , 2)
2. nocs granted before guidelines may not suffice. (Para 3 , 4)
3. contentions on safety and environmental risks in vicinity. (Para 5 , 6)
4. safety principles must be prioritized over previous approvals. (Para 7 , 8)
5. establishment of a joint committee to assess compliance. (Para 9 , 10)

ORDER

1. Grievance in this application is against approval to the proposed petrol pump at Khasra No. 41/1 min Village Jagjeetpur Mustehkam, District Haridwar, in violation of CPCB Guidelines dated 07.01.2020 inter-alia as follows:-

Siting criteria of Retail outlets In case of siting criteria for petrol pumps new Retail Outlets shall not be located within a radial distance of 50 meters (from fill point/ dispensing units/vent pipe whichever is nearest) from schools, hospitals (10 beds and above) and residential areas designated as per local laws. In case of constrains in providing 50 meters distance, the retail outlet shall implement additional safety measures as prescribed by PESO. In no case the distance between new retail outlet from schools, hospitals (10 beds and above) and residential area shall pass over the retail outlet.

2. It is submitted that the proposed site is close to a Play School named Ping Pong and a Gas Agency and is thus a high-risk location. There are also high-tension wires just above the site. In respect of the said site, vide earlier order dated 25.10.2020, the National Highway Division, PWD declined to grant NOC but later, on 28.11.2019, NOC has been granted by the same Authority and on that basis, the District Magistrate, Haridwar also granted NOC on 21.12.2019. Before such NOCs were granted, this Tribunal had passed an order on 18.01.2019 in O.A. No. 86 of 2019, Gyan Prakash @ Pappu Singh v. UOI & Ors., requiring the CPCB to lay down the siting criteria for petrol pumps and such siting criteria was accordingly laid down by the CPCB on 07.01.2020. In view of the above averments, the Tribunal sought a factual report from a joint Committee comprising State PCB, District Magistrate, Dehradun and SEIAA, Uttarakhand.

3. The Tribunal also referred to another matter involving the same issue being O.A. No 163/2020, Roshan Joshi v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors. but the said matter was disposed of on 27.11.2020, after considering the factual report that the NOC had been cancelled and the matter was pending before the High Court. The operative part of the said order is as follows:-

1xxx..xxx.xxx

2. Vide order dated 17.08.2020, a factual and action taken report was sought from a joint Committee comprising the State PCB, District Magistrate, Dehradun and the SEIAA, Uttarakhand. No notice has so far been issued by this Tribunal to any other party and therefore, there is no occasion for any such party entering appearance, at this stage.

3. A report has been filed on 14.10.2020 by the State PCB to the effect that NOC was cancelled which is subject matter of challenge before the High Court in Writ Petition No. 1488/2020, Shri Sandeep Jain vs. District Magistrate and Ors. and there is an interim stay of cancellation of the NOC.

4. In view of above, the application is disposed of. The matter will be governed by the order which may be passed by the High Court. It will be open to the concerned parties to put forward their grievance in the said proceedings as per law.

4. In the present matter, the report has been filed by the Executive Engineer, National Highway Division, Dehradun as follows:-

That the District Magistrate, Haridwar informed the respondent no. 4 about the withdrawal of no objection certificate regarding establishment of Retail Outlet in view of the Guidelines issued by the Ministry of Road Transport and National Highway, Govt. of India vide its letter bearing no. RW/NH-33023/19/99/DO/III dated 24.07.2013.

5. In an action taken report filed by the State PCB on 13.01.2021, it is stated as follows :-

The Proposed site is situated at khasra no-41/1 mi, Vill- Gagjeetp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top