SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
MR. SHEO KUMAR SINGH, J, DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EM
Jindal Power Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change – Respondent
Original Application No. 11/2025(CZ) | I.A. No. 14/2025 | I.A. No. 17/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv., Ms. Gauri Rasgotra, Adv., Mr. Dinesh Moorjani, Adv., Mr. Priya Shri Sharma, Adv., Mr. Girish Ahuja, Adv., Mr. Manish Kharbanda, Adv., Ms. Ekta Gupta, Adv.
For the Respondents: Ms. Suhasini Sen, Adv., Ms. Masooma Rizvi, Adv., Ms. Surbhi, Adv., Mr. Abhinay Sharma, Adv., Mr. Pooran Chand Roy, Adv., Ms. Parul Khurana, Adv.

The court affirmed that all environmental clearances, including for the coal washery, must transfer to the successful bidder, ensuring compliance with original conditions without imposing new restrictions without due process.

Headnote:(A) Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 - Sections 6 and 8 - Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Environment Clearance (EC) - The applicant seeks enforcement of the Government of India order allowing continued operations of coal washery and mining under EC from 12.06.2012 - Issues arose from MoEF's transfer of EC and the requirement imposed on the applicant to obtain a new EC for coal washery. (Paras 1, 70, 106)

(B) Environmental Compliance - The Tribunal determined the rights and controls regarding the coal washery and concluded that the applicant's operations must continue under the existing EC as per the transfer secured by the vesting order dated 02.05.2023, despite modifications introduced by the MoEF's subsequent letter. (Paras 70, 106)

(C) Principle of Natural Justice - The court found that due process was not followed in imposing additional conditions upon the applicant without an opportunity for hearing; hence, the directives from MoEF were deemed arbitrary and void. (Paras 71, 106)

(D) Environmental Sustainability - The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the coal washery for environmental protection and stability in energy supply, underscoring the necessity of compliance with original EC dated 12.06.2012 for its ongoing operations. (Paras 59, 66)

Findings of Court:
The Court ruled in favor of the applicant, clarifying that the original EC remains valid and must be honored, ordering the government to reassess the imposed conditions for their legality.

Result: The application is upheld and the conditions imposed by MoEF were set aside.

Table of Content
1. filing of original application for enforcement of regulations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. environmental clearances were granted and processes followed for mining operations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. exemptions sought from certain conditions related to coal washery. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. interim orders and legal disputes regarding custodianship. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. high court's recognition of control over coal washery. (Para 13 , 14)
6. legal compliance arguments posed by applicant. (Para 15)
7. ongoing operations vs compliance with environmental regulations. (Para 16)
8. impact on environment and public interest concerning coal washing. (Para 17)
9. court's exploration of environmental and operational laws. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT

1. This original application has been filed to enforce the order of Government of India, Ministry of Coal, issued under Section 6 of the Coal Mines Special Provision Act, 2015, named as vesting order with its terms and conditions specifically annexure-03/vesting order in light of the EC granted in favour of the project proponent-applicant in the year 2012.

2. Ministry of Coal issued a letter dated 01.07.1998 allotting the subject coal mine to the prior allottee, JPL. Pursuant to the allocation, MoEF on 22.09.2004 granted. EC to JPL for opencast coal mining of 5.25 MTPA in the subject coal mine. On 27.01.2006, CECB issued letters granting CTO to JPL under Section 21 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and under Section 25 & 26 of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 . Pursuant to the CTOs, JPL started mining operations at the subject coal mine.

3. On 22.08.2007, MoEF issued Terms of Reference ("TOR") to JPL for expansion of mine capacity for opencast coal mining from 5.25 MTPA to 6.25 MTPA and for underground coal mining of 0.75 MTPA. On 22.08.2007, MoEF also issued another TOR for Coal Washery of 4.75 MTPA proposed to be established by JPL. The EAC recommended preparation of an integrated EIA-EMP report for the coal mine and the washery, both being in the adjoining area. The TOR, inter alia, included preparation of EIA-EMP assessing impact of operation of coal washery, transportation of washed coal to pit head, and other related issues of air, water, and solid waste generation and proposed mitigative measures.

4. MoEF, on 12.06.2012, granted EC to JPL for expansion of opencast coal mining from 5.25 ΜΤΡΑ to 6.25 MTPA and underground mining of 0.75 MTPA (having total combined production of 6.25 MTPA). The EC further granted permission to JPL for establishment of a pit-head coal washery of 4.75 MTPA, wherein the specific conditions (xx), (xxi), (xxii), (xxii), (xxvi), (xxvii), (xxviii), (xxxii) were included in the EC dated 12.06.2012 with respect to coal washery. It may be noted that the only reason behind the combined EC was that the mining and washery proposals were in the adjoining area. Further, CECB granted CTOs for mining and washery separately, being two distinct activities.

5. On 12.02.2013, CECB granted two CTOs to JPL for the Coal Washery of 4.75 MTPA under Section 21 of Air Act and Section s 25 and 26 of the Water Act, for a period of one year from the date of issuance of the said letter i.e., till 11.02.2014 which was subsequently renewed from time to time. Similarly, on 01.01.2014, CECB also granted CTOs to JPL for opencast and underground coal mining project for 6.25 MTPA under the Air Act and Water Act, for a period of one year from the date of issuance of the said letter. Meanwhile, the Hon’ble Supreme Court by its order dated 24.09.2014 in W.P. (Crl.) 120 of 2012 cancelled allocation of 204 coal blocks including the subject coal mine. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its order identified 42 operational mines, which included the subject mine and permitted such mines to continue their operations till 31.03.2015. CECB on 09.10.2014 renewed CTOs granted to JPL for Coal Washery of 4.75 MTPA, from 12.02.2014 to 11.02.2016.

6. The Central Government conduct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top