SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 402

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CHENNAI (SOUTHERN ZONE BENCH)
Smt. Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, Dr. Satyagopal Korlapati, JJ
P. CHENNAIAH – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MASAPET – Respondent
121/2023 / CHENNAI



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M.K.THANGANILA
For the Respondent:

The Tribunal ruled that the construction of a petroleum retail outlet violated CPCB guidelines due to its proximity to a water body and residential area, justifying the revocation of the NOC.

Headnote:(A) Environmental Protection Act, 1986 - Central Pollution Control Board Guidelines - No Objection Certificate (NOC) - Allegations of environmental violations regarding the construction of a petroleum retail outlet near a water body - The Tribunal found that the outlet's location violated CPCB guidelines mandating a minimum distance from water bodies and residential areas. (Paras 19, 20, 24)

(B) Precautionary Principle - The Tribunal emphasized the need for precautionary measures to prevent environmental risks associated with petroleum spillage and vapour emissions affecting local water sources. (Paras 24, 25)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, a farmer and social worker, alleged that the construction of a petroleum retail outlet by the 6th Respondent violated environmental laws due to its proximity to the Kalikiri Irrigation Project, which supports over 5,000 families. (Paras 1, 2, 4)

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found that the NOC granted was invalid due to violations of CPCB guidelines regarding the siting of petroleum outlets, leading to the conclusion that the outlet posed environmental risks. (Paras 25, 26)

Issues: The main issues included the validity of the NOC granted for the petroleum outlet and its compliance with CPCB guidelines regarding proximity to water bodies and residential areas. (Paras 19, 24)

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal ruled that the proximity of the outlet to a water body and residential area constituted a direct violation of CPCB guidelines, justifying the revocation of the NOC. (Paras 19, 25)

Result: The Original Application is disposed of, and the NOC granted to the dealer is revoked.

JUDGEMENT

Delivered by Smt. Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, Judicial Member

1. The applicant, who is a small farmer and social worker and also a resident of Kalikiri Village, Andhra Pradesh, filed this present Original Applicant, alleging environmental violations linked to the Kalikiri Irrigation Project.

2. It is alleged in the application that the 6th Respondent (wrongly mentioned as 5th Respondent) unlawfully obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to construct a petroleum retail outlet on land parcels comprised in Survey Nos.342 and 342/1, measuring 0.51 Acres and 0.34 Acres, respectively, and Katta No. 1192. The site is located within 50 meters of water bodies connected to the Kalikiri Irrigation Project, which is in violation of Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Guidelines. The disputed site is located near the Kalikiri Irrigation Project’s reservoir, a critical resource for irrigation, drinking water, and fisheries supporting over 5,000 families.

3. The construction of a petroleum retail outlet poses risks of petroleum spillage, threatening the water source and jeopardizing local agriculture, drinking water supply, and cattle- rearing activities.

4. Despite repeated complaints to the authorities concerned, no action has been taken. Hence, the applicant has no other option but to approach this Tribunal, seeking intervention to revoke the NOC granted to the 6th Respondent.

5. The applicant has originally impleaded the 5th Respondent/K. Shajahan, who is the owner of the property in dispute. However, during the pendency of the matter, one Mr. Kamuluri Babsaheb, who is a dealer of the 4th Respondent (M/s. HPCL) and the Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board (APPCB were Suo Motu impleaded by this Tribunal as additional Respondents No.6 and 7 respectively, vide Order dated 02.09.2024.

6. Upon notice, the respondents have entered appearance through their counsels and filed their respective pleadings.

7. The 3rd Respondent, who is the District Revenue Officer, Annamayya District, filed a report dated 08.07.2024, stating that upon enquiry, it was established that the land in Survey No.342/1 is privately owned by K. Shajahan, with a clear title and approved conversion from agricultural to non- agricultural use by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle. The site is free from disputes or encroachments and is enclosed by a compound wall. It is adjacent to "Oota Cheruvu" (a water body), with dispensing units located within 10 meters of the water body. No objections were raised by local residents during the inquiry. The report confirmed that petrol bunk operations involve underground storage tanks, mitigating risks of spillage or pollution. The applicant’s concerns were found to be unsubstantiated due to a lack of evidence. The administrative approvals were thoroughly reviewed, and the No Objection Certificate (NOC) was deemed valid with no procedural deficiencies.

8. The 3rd Respondent also produced a copy of the report dated 05.11.2022 of the Tahsildar – Kalikiri, wherein it is stated that the proposed site in Sy. No.342/1 (0.34 cents) in Kalikiri Village is suitable for granting an NOC for a petroleum retail outlet. The report states that the land, owned by K. Shajahan (S/o K. Khadar Saheb) under Khata No. 1192, is free from disputes and encroachments, has been converted to non-agricultural use with approval from the Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle, and meets all regulatory requirements for storing 16,000 litres of Motor Spirit (MS) and 35,000 litres of High-Speed Diesel (HSD). Originally, it was classified as ‘Government-Dry’ land in Survey No. 342 (0.51 cents), and it was later subdivided into Sy. Nos.342/1 (0.34 cents) and 342/2 (0.17 cents). The site has clearly marked boundaries (East: Dhasthagiri’s land, West/North: Government land, South: Road) and is easily accessible to the public, being adjacent to Piler-Madanapalle Road. No objections were raised by the community regarding the establishment of the outlet, indica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top