Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
SUDHIR AGARWAL, J, AFROZ AHMAD, ACJ
RIDHIMA PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims regarding environmental protection laws. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. observations on the need for compliance with environmental protection efforts. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. findings of the joint committee on environmental impacts. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. legal assessments of permissions granted and oversight failures. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. final conclusions regarding mining activities and responsibilities. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT
BY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER
1. This Original Application (hereinafter referred to as ‘OA’) was registered by Tribunal under Sections 14 and 15 of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NGT Act, 2010’) in exercise of suo-moto jurisdiction in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita Sinha , (2022) 13 SCC 401, in the light of complaint made in the Letter Petition dated 09.04.2022, sent by Ridhima Pandey, daughter of Dinesh Chandra Pandey, resident of 16 A, Sadhu Belapuram Colony, Haripur Kalan, District-Dehradun who claims herself to be a Global Climate activist and engaged i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
