SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 575

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL KOLKATA (EASTERN ZONE BENCH)
B. Amit Sthalekar, JM, Dr. Arun Kumar Verma, EM
Binay Basfore – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
Original Application No.88/2024/EZ



Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Mr. Ankur Sharma
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Sudip Kumar Dutta, Mr. Dipanjan Ghosh, Ms. Rashhmi Singhee, Mr. Sibojyoti Chakrabarti

Court emphasizes protection of water bodies and responsible management by landowners to prevent illegal filling and pollution.

Headnote:(A) Environmental Protection Laws - West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - West Bengal Inland Fisheries Act - Town and Country (Planning and Development) Act, 1952 - Pollution - Allegations of illegal filling of a pond by the Respondent; Writ petition previously filed for protection of water body. (Paras 2, 4)

(B) Compliance of the earlier court order for inspection and restoration of the pond; responsibility of landowner confirmed in a Committee report directing sustainable maintenance of the water body. (Paras 16-26)

(C) The principle that encroachments and illegal activities on water bodies must be avoided to ensure ecological balance. (Paras 14, 18)

Facts of the case:
The applicant alleged the illegal filling of a pond by the Respondent No.12; prior orders from the High Court for restoration of the pond were also provided in the judgment.

Findings of Court:
The pond was found cleared and restored as per previous orders, yet concerns over debris dumping by neighbors were noted.

Issues: The main issues were regarding illegal filling of the pond, maintenance responsibilities of water bodies, and the surrounding encroachments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that it is imperative to protect water bodies and ensured that surrounding residents do not encroach on or dump waste in the water body while directing the Respondent No.12 to maintain the health of the pond.

Result: The Original Application No.88/2024/EZ is accordingly disposed of.

Table of Content
1. allegations regarding the illegal filling of the pond. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 6)
2. prior judicial orders concerning the water body's restoration. (Para 3 , 5 , 8)
3. findings about state of the pond during inspections. (Para 10 , 12 , 17)
4. clarification of responsibilities for maintaining the water body. (Para 14 , 15 , 18 , 19)
5. final decision directing compliance and environmental protection. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)

ORDER

1. Affidavit dated 17.10.2024 has been filed on behalf of the Respondent No.12, Mohammad Moinuddin Ansari; the same is taken on record.

2. Another affidavit dated 29.01.2024 has been filed by the Respondent No.12, Mohammad Moinuddin Ansari; the same is taken on record.

(Final order of the said case will be uploaded in website in separate sheets of paper).

ORDER

1. The allegation of the Applicant in the present Original Application is that the Respondent No.12, Mohammad Moinuddin Ansari, is filling up a pond measuring about 20 decimals situated in L.R. Dag No.305/477, L.R. Khatian No.1128, J.L. No.32, Police Station- Sankrail of Mouza-Banipur, District-Howrah. It is stated that the Respondent No.12 is the owner of the „Pukur Par‟ (Pond) in question which is recorded as such in the Record of Rights.

2. It is alleged that the Respondent No.12 had constructed a brick boundary wall on the said „Pukur Par‟ against which a writ petition being W.P.A. (P) No.13 of 2022 was filed by the Applicant. It is stated that in the said Writ Petition, a Report in the form of affidavit dated 16.03.2022 was filed by the Block Land and Land Reforms Officer and Special Revenue Officer-II, Sankrail, District-Howrah, stating therein that there is a bamboo fencing between 9268 square feet/21.27 decimal (approx..) and 1038 square feet (approx.) of „Pukur‟/Pond and on both sides of the fencing the Pukur is filled with water hyacinth. It was stated that on the north-eastern side 3330 square feet (approx.) area is filled with piled up rubbish as noticed during physical verification. It was also stated that adjacent Plot No.305/4777 (L.R.) corresponding R.S. Plot No.308 is recorded as “Pukur Parh” and L.R. Plot No.306 corresponding to R.S. Plot No.309 is recorded as „Bastu‟ in favour of one Moinuddin Ansari. It was also stated that the western and northern side of the plots recorded in the Khatian of Moinuddin Ansari is surrounded by six feet height boundary. It was specifically stated that no pond filling work was going on during physical verification.

3. It is also stated that the said Writ Petition was disposed of by the Hon‟ble High Court vide its order dated 23.08.2022 with a direction to the Block Land and Land Reforms Officer, Howrah, to give an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties and also verify the existing position on the spot with due intimation to the concerned parties and take appropriate decision in accordance with law to ensure that the water body and the embankment are protected and no illegal filling up takes place in violation of any of the provisions of the Act or the Rules.

4. The allegation of the Applicant is that a six feet boundary wall has been constructed all around the Plot Nos.306, 305 through L.R. Plot No.477 which is totally illegal. It is also stated that the Respondent No.12 has prayed for permission to clean up the pond and to repair the Pukur Par.

5. We find that the order of the Block Land & Land Reforms Officer, Sankrail, Howrah, stated to be in compliance of the order of the Hon‟ble High Court has been filed at page no.59 of the paper book, para 4 of which mentions that “dumping of garbage on one side of the water body is in corroboration with the written statement filed by the alleged raiyat Moinuddin Ansari”. Para 6 of the said order also mentions that “since there is no proof of filling of the waterbody by the Raiyat no penal action could be taken for violation of Section 4 C (2) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act , 1955”.

6. The Inspector-In-Charge, Sankrail Police Station has filed a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top