SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 2002

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Vijay Kulkarni, Expert Member
Avadesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Original Application No.44/2024(CZ)|I.A.No.143/2024



Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): Mr. Gourvanvit Jain, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Amit Mishra, Adv., Mr. Prashant M. Harne, Adv., Ms. Parul Bhadoria, Adv., Mr.Om Shankar Shrivastava, Adv.

Notified protected forest land encroached upon must be immediately cleared and restored to forest department per demarcation reports, rejecting regularization via denied diversion/exchange applications.

Headnote:(A) Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Section 29 - Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Section 2 - Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Section 248 - Encroachment on protected forest land - Gazette notification declaring revenue land as protected forest - Multiple demarcations confirming encroachment by private entity on specific khasra numbers totaling 0.445 hectares post partial removal - Pending land diversion/exchange application rejected by authorities - No action taken despite repeated directions - Tribunal directs immediate removal of remaining encroachment and restoration to forest department as per demarcation reports. (Paras 1, 2, 16, 17)

(B) Environmental Law - Public Trust Doctrine - Inter-generational equity - Encroachment on forest land in tiger movement area undermines ecological balance - State authorities must act swiftly to remove illegal occupation without compromising natural resources held in trust for future generations - Revenue authorities empowered for summary ejectment and penalties. (Paras 9, 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
Application filed alleging encroachment on gazette notified protected forest land comprising specific khasra numbers totaling over 3.91 hectares initially, reduced to 0.445 hectares after partial removal. Joint committee inspected site, confirmed remaining encroachment used for university entrance gate and road, surrounded by dense forest. Respondent claimed demarcation error leading to land swap, sought exchange, but proposal rejected. High Court earlier directed demarcation, revealing encroachment.

Findings of Court:
Encroachment verified through multiple demarcations and joint committee report - remaining 0.194 hectares on one khasra and 0.251 hectares on another confirmed as protected forest post notification - no deliberate construction beyond gate/road observed but illegal occupation persists - diversion application invalid.

Issues: Whether remaining encroachment on notified protected forest requires immediate removal despite claims of demarcation error and rejected land exchange; jurisdiction and duty of authorities to enforce demarcation orders and forest laws.

Ratio Decidendi: Once land declared protected forest, any unauthorized occupation must be removed forthwith per demarcation findings - rejected diversion/exchange leaves no scope for regularization - state/revenue/forest authorities bound to execute prior court directions and restore land without delay to uphold forest conservation.

Result: Original Application disposed with direction for immediate removal of demarcated encroachment and handing possession to forest department; compliance report required. (Para 17)

Table of Content
1. encroachment on protected forest land confirmed by demarcations. (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. respondent claims demarcation error and land exchange. (Para 3 , 4 , 13 , 14)
3. legal provisions mandate removal of forest encroachments. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 15)
4. authorities must enforce demarcation and remove encroachment. (Para 16)
5. order immediate removal and possession to forest department. (Para 17 , 18)

ORDER

1. Issue raised in this application is encroachment over Gazette Notified Protected Forest, vide Gazette Notification dated 30.07.2021 bearing Khasra No. 73, 84 and 92 to the extent of 1.236, 0.846, 1.828 hectares respectively situated in village Chandanpura, Tehsil Huzur District Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh by Respondent No. 6. Aforementioned area was declared Protected Forest by the Government of Madhya Pradesh exercise of powers conferred under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and even after multiple government agencies have carried out numerous demarcations and observed illegal encroachment of Respondent No. 6 over Protected Forest, in the tiger movement area no action has been taken by the authorities to remove the said illegal encroachment.

2. The matter was taken up by this tribunal and a committee consisting Principal Secretary (Environment), Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Collector Bhopal and the Member Secretary, State Pollution Control Board was constituted with direction to submit the factual and action taken report. The members of the committee visited the site and submitted the report as follows :

“During inspection, Joint Committee visited the disputed site. The details observed during the inspection are mentioned as under: -

1. The site is located at Village Chandanpura, Tehsil Huzur, District Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. The geographical location of the site is latitude 23(cid:176) 10’ 37.1172’’ N and longitude 77(cid:176) 23’ 21.2604’’ E.

2. The gate of Jagran Lake City University is on the north east of the site.

3. An existing bitumen road connects the Jagran Lake City University for access. The road passes through revenue Forest land. Jagran Lake City University is having only one approach road.

4. The surroundings of the access road and the main entry of the university are surrounded by forest land.

5. One “Nagar Van” developed by Forest department is situated adjacent to the University campus on south side of the main entrance of university.

6. The forest area is having very thick plantation and dense forest.

7. The Forest department officials provided the map which shows the hatched region as encroached land and had shown the committee members the encroached land which is Forest land and currently the University is having its entrance gate and approach road

8. This encroached area by the University is having green belt with ornamental plantation. No building construction is observed except the main gate, security hut and the entrance road.

9. The adjacent area which is presently in possession of the Forest department is secured by a 12 feet high wire mesh which separates the Forest land from the said encroached land by the University.

10. Within the campus of University the ornamental plants and green belt is developed all around the campus.

Information provided by the Forest Department

In references to the present petition, information was sought from the Forest department. Forest department vide letter no. 5067 dated 25/04/2024 has provided the information. The copy of letter is enclosed as Annexure III. The main points of this communication are mentioned as under:-

1.1 The encroachment in the past was found on the khasra number 73 by 1.236 hectares, on the khasra number 84 by 0.846 hectares and on the khasra number 92 by 1.828 hectares, totaling 3.91 hectares.

1.2 In the appeal case no. 08/Appeal/2019-20 in the court of Tehsildar Revenue T.T. Nagar, Bhopal, a joint action was taken and encroachment of area 1.042 hectares from khasra no. 73, 0.595 hectares from khasra no. 84 and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top