SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 2027

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PUNE (WESTERN ZONE BENCH)
Dinesh Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Vijay Kulkarni, Expert Member
DOMINGOS CRASTO – Appellant
Versus
Goa State Coastal Zone Management Authority – Respondent
Appeal No.50/2022(WZ)|I.A. No.179/2022(WZ)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Dattaprasad Lawande, Mr. Pradosh Dangui, Mr. S. Swaminathan
For the Respondents: Mrs. Shirin Khajuria, Ms. Shreya Mathur, Mrs. Judith Almeida

Re-examination of structures' pre-1991 existence in CRZ NDZ permissible on fresh evidence and court directions, overriding prior clearance; dubious documents rejected against official surveys showing post-1991 construction.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Sections 16 and 18(1) - Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification, 1991 - Structures in No Development Zone (NDZ) of CRZ-III - Appeal against demolition order - Earlier order holding structures pre-1991 dropped proceedings, but subsequent re-examination mandated by High Court directions in related proceedings upheld - Documents like pre-1948 construction license and 1979 repair permission held unreliable due to lack of translation, absence from official records (RTI reply), no link to appellant's ownership, and government survey plans (1972, 2006, 2009) showing no structures - No impermissible review as re-assessment based on fresh evidence and court directions, not barred by res judicata - Post-1991/reconstructed permanent structures (G+1 building, shops) without permissions illegal - Demolition directed within 30 days. (Paras 32, 34, 35, 37-40, 42)

(B) Administrative Law - Review jurisdiction - Authority lacks power to review merits but may re-examine on fresh evidence/material pursuant to superior court directions without violating res judicata. (Paras 35, 40)

Facts of the case:
Appellant challenged demolition order for structures in NDZ, claiming pre-1991 existence based on 1948 license, 1979 repair permission, and prior authority order. Respondents contested documents' authenticity, citing missing records, survey plans sans structures till post-2009, post-purchase (2004) commercial constructions without permissions.

Findings of Court:
Impugned demolition order correct; structures absent in key surveys pre-2009, emerged later without authorization; prior clearance erroneously granted on dubious documents.

Issues: Whether structures pre-existed 1991 justifying exemption; validity of re-examination post-earlier clearance; reliability of proffered permissions against official surveys/records.

Ratio Decidendi: Pre-1991 existence unproven by unreliable documents absent from records and contradicted by official surveys; re-assessment lawful on fresh evidence under court mandates, not review.

Result: Appeal dismissed; demolition within 30 days from judgment upload.

Table of Content
1. pre-1991 structures authorized under crz if permitted pre-notification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. high court directions mandate gczma re-examination of crz structures. (Para 5 , 6 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. gczma cannot review merits without new evidence; re-assessment allowed. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 13 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. structures post-1991 illegal in ndz without permissions or survey proof. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. impugned demolition order upheld due to lack of pre-1991 evidence. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal has been filed, under Section 18(1) read-with Section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, against the order dated 13.10.2022 passed by the respondent No.1- Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority (GCZMA) directing the appellant to demolish the structures in the property bearing Survey No.12/1 of Village Sernabatim, Salcette-Goa within a period of 30 days from the date of decision taken in 325th Meeting of the respondent No.1- GCZMA held on 30.09.2022 and 04.10.2022.

2. In brief, the facts of this case are that the ancestors of the appellant had constructed a house in the property bearing Survey No.12/1 of Village Sernabatim in the year 1948, after obtaining permission from “Camara Municipal De Salcette”, the then administrative body in the erstwhile Portuguese regime, having jurisdiction over the Villages of Salcette Taluka. The said structure was repaired by the father of appellant in the year 1979 after obtaining the permission for repair and renovation from the Village Panchayat of Sernabatim, Vanelim & Colva. The ancestors of appellant and the appellant were always in possession of the said property since 1948 and therefore, the appellant subsequently purchased the said property.

3. It is further mentioned in this appeal that on 23.09.2007, the respondent No.1- GCZMA issued a show cause notice to the appellant based on a complaint from one Mr. Agostinho Godinho (not party herein) for violation of CRZ Notification, to which the appellant filed reply dated 12.11.2007 and thereafter, the respondent No.1-GCZMA carried out site inspection to map the structures and to verify the details on the site. These structures were mapped by a team of officials from the Directorate of Settlement and Land Records (DSLR) in association with the members of the GCZMA. Upon examining the map prepared by the DSLR, the respondent No.1-GCZMA arrived on a conclusion that the structure was old, which existed prior to the year 1991 and accordingly, took a decision vide Order dated 31.12.2008 that the same was held to be an authorized structure, which was in existence prior to coming into force the CRZ Notification, 1991 and decided to drop the said show cause notice.

4. It is further mentioned in this appeal that the respondent No.1 had considered the legality of the structure of the appellant, on the basis of following documents:-

i. The construction licence issued by "Camara Municipal De Salcete" dated 11/05/1948.

ii. Permission dated 31/03/1979 for repairs and renovation of the structure issued by Village Panchayat Sernabatim.

iii. Copy of Form I and XIV.

5. It is further mentioned in this appeal that the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Goa in SMWP No.2/2006 had taken cognizance of the illegalities/constructions in CRZ area and vide order dated 26.09.2007, directed all the panchayats/municipalities to submit action taken report as regards the construction in NDZ/CRZ area within the State of Goa. It is further submitted that in the same Writ Petition, vide order dated 12/01/2015, it was further directed to the Village Panchayat of Sernabatim, Vanelim, Colva and Gaundalim to place the material on record before the GCZMA and thereupon the GCZMA was directed to examine the same after according due hearing to the parties. It is further submitted that the Respondent No.3- Private Complainant had intervened in the matter by filing an Interven

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top