Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Arun Kumar Verma, Expert Member
Anany Singh Pawar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. encroachment on parks and tree cutting under re-densification challenged. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. project approvals by committees under re-densification policy 2016. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. parties argue on green belt maintenance and compensatory planting. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. forest conservation and tree importance for ecological balance. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. project upheld with 10:1 afforestation directions. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER
1. The grievance of the applicant in this application is encroachment on the two public parks in the Rajasva Colony, Gurunank Market Friganj, District Ujjan (M.P.), cutting of the trees which are properly grown up, violation of conditions of necessity of play grounds, parks for children as laid down by the Town and Country Planning Department, diversion of public park for building constructions in violation of Article 21, 48 (A) and Article 51 (g) of the Constitution of India. It is further alleged that open spaces are mandatory environmental safeguard, which are essential to be maintained as a green area or green belt and further construction of multi story buildings damaging the park and green belt area may cause environme
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
