NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Prasoon Pant – Appellant
Versus
UPPCB – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hospitality establishments require pollution consents (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. uppcb reports non-compliance and notices issued (Para 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. tribunal directs comprehensive compliance survey (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. status: compliant, non-compliant, closed, closure notices (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. hearing responses; compliant units allowed operation (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. three-month grace for consents; monitor compliance (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
ORDER
1. This original application was instituted by Prasoon Pant and Pradeep Kumar, applicants, under Section 14 and 15 of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NGT Act, 2010’) raising a complaint against Hospitality Establishments like restaurants, hotels, malls, operating in District Ghaziabad without obtaining requisite consent under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as Water Act, 1974’) and Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Air Act, 1981’).
2. The applicant initially impleaded respondents 7 to 27, which are some of the hotels, restaurants and malls, and according to the applicants, wer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.