SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 2067

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)
Sudhir Agarwal, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Prasoon Pant – Appellant
Versus
UPPCB – Respondent
Original Application No. 294/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rahul Choudhary, Ms. Shreepurna Dasgupta
For the Respondents: Mr. Pradeep Misra, Mr. Vikas Mishra, Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Ms. Tejaswini Chandrasekhar, Ms. Shaima Masood, Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rajawat, Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh, Mr. Mukesh Verma, Ms. Vatsala Tripathi, Mr. Vibhav Mishra, Mr. Vinit Kumar Jha, Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Mr. Shubham, Mr. Shambho Nandy, Ms. Anoushka Dey, Mr. Kartik Nagarkatti, Ms. Aditi Shama, Mr. Niraj kumar, Ms. Shubhnangda Singh, Mr. Adesh Kumar, Mr. Raj Kumar, Mr. Ashok Kumar, Mr. Sumit Mudgal, Mr. Madhav Singh, Ms. Manisha Sharma, Mr. Aviral Pandey, Mr. Sunil Kumar Gupta, Ms. Chandni Kumari, Mr. Shubham Budhiraja, Ms. Prakriti Rastogi, Mr. Azad Bansala, Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Vinita Raghav, Mr. Nishant Srivastava, Mr. Aman Vashishth, Mr. Dilip Agarwal

Hospitality establishments must obtain pollution control consents; non-compliant units granted three months for regularization, failing which closure and compensation enforced by regulator.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Sections 14 and 15 - Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 25, 26, 33A - Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 - Section 21 - Hospitality establishments (hotels, restaurants, malls, banquets) operating without requisite consents - In critically polluted area with high pollution levels, such establishments required to obtain consents and comply with environmental norms as per guidelines issued pursuant to Tribunal directions - UPPCB directed to survey, issue notices, impose environmental compensation, and enforce closure against non-compliant units - Tribunal grants three months to non-compliant units to obtain consents, failing which closure orders to be implemented with recovery of compensation; compliant units allowed to operate subject to monitoring; existing closure orders appealable, with modification if consents obtained subsequently. (Paras 1, 3, 6, 9-10, 13-16, 20-23)

(B) Environmental Compliance - Enforcement - Pollution Control Boards must conduct comprehensive surveys of polluting units, ensure uniform application of compensation based on capital investment/assets, take punitive/preventive/remedial actions including closure, and file periodic compliance reports; lack of knowledge not a valid excuse for non-compliance. (Paras 8-9, 11, 20-24)

Facts of the case:
Application filed alleging operation of numerous hospitality establishments without consents under pollution control laws in critically polluted district; UPPCB submitted status reports identifying 146+ units, of which 51 compliant, 52 without consent, 3 closed, 40 facing closure notices/compensation, 15 closure orders issued; further 17 newly compliant units identified.

Findings of Court:
Compliant units allowed to function subject to renewal and monitoring; non-compliant granted three months to obtain consents, post which closure and compensation recovery; UPPCB to ensure compliance and report by 15.01.2025.

Issues: Whether hospitality establishments can operate sans pollution consents; adequacy of regulatory actions like notices, compensation, closures; time allowance for compliance in ongoing operations.

Ratio Decidendi: Environmental norms mandatory for specified establishments; regulators must enforce strictly via surveys, notices, compensation calibrated to operations scale, and closures; time-bound opportunity for regularization provided considering possible lack of awareness, but non-compliance triggers rigorous penalties.

Result: Original Application disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. hospitality establishments require pollution consents (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. uppcb reports non-compliance and notices issued (Para 4 , 5 , 7)
3. tribunal directs comprehensive compliance survey (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. status: compliant, non-compliant, closed, closure notices (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. hearing responses; compliant units allowed operation (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
6. three-month grace for consents; monitor compliance (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

ORDER

1. This original application was instituted by Prasoon Pant and Pradeep Kumar, applicants, under Section 14 and 15 of National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NGT Act, 2010’) raising a complaint against Hospitality Establishments like restaurants, hotels, malls, operating in District Ghaziabad without obtaining requisite consent under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as Water Act, 1974’) and Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Air Act, 1981’).

2. The applicant initially impleaded respondents 7 to 27, which are some of the hotels, restaurants and malls, and according to the applicants, were functioning without obtaining consent under the aforesaid Statutes.

3. Applicant stated that Ghaziabad is classified as ‘critically polluted area’ by Central Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPCB’), based on Comprehensive Environment Pollution Index and one of the ‘non-attainment cities’, wherein level of PM10 from industrial and vehicular sources is amongst the highest in the country. Respondent 7 to 27 are hospitality entities running full fledged, eateries, restaurants, etc. and within the purview of directions given by this Tribunal vide order dated 04.02.2021 in O.A 400 of 2017, Westend Green Farm Society versus Union of India and others., wherein CPCB was asked to come up with a set of directions for complying with environmental norms by such eateries, hotels, banquets, food joints and restaurants. Under the guidelines of CPCB, individual eateries and restaurants on road sides with a minimum seating capacity of 36 people and also running hospitality destinations such as hotels, banquets and malls, etc, or otherwise, are required to seek and obtain consent under the above Statutes from UP Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘UPPCB’) in addition to a host of other environmental authorizations. As most of these establishments have food courts and restaurants, being in their nature of business, these dining-out outlets are required to have environmental clearances as directed by Tribunal in aforementioned OA. The 21 hospitality establishments impleaded in the application are in violation of the CPCB and UPPCB directions framed in the wake of NGT order in the aforementioned OA, as these do not have an NOC of State Pollution Control Board. Being in the vicinity of national capital, hospitality industry of Ghaziabad has s a high footfall of around 40-50 lakhs people a month that could be generating lots of air and water pollution and misuse of already stressed resources, such as groundwater. Hence, it becomes all-the-more important that business establishments strictly follow the environmental norms.

4. Tribunal being prima facie satisfied that a substantial question relating to environment has arisen due to implementation of enactments is specified in schedule 1 to NGT Act, 2010, found it appropriate to issue notices initially only to respondents 1 and 2 requiring them to file their responses.

5. UPPCB through Regional Officer, Ghaziabad submitted its status report dated 05.07.2023 giving status of 20 banquets, hotels and malls with regard to ‘consent’ as under:-

SL. No Name of the premises Status of NOC/Consent Remarks

1.Hotel Golden Tulip C-5, Sector — 18, VasundharaYes, upto 31-07-2023 (Annexure-1)
2.M/s Silver Spoon C-7, Sector — 18, GhaziabadYes, upto 31-07-2025 (Annexure-2)
3.Hotel crystal palace 2163, sector 16A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top